|
|
|
|
|
February 11th, 2003, 01:41 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bordesholm, Germany
Posts: 781
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
My problems with simultaneous
I do not get it, every once in a while strange and unpredictable things happen. Ships fly through black hole systems although I saw the blue line for the route was bypassing the sucking system, but maybe it was a mistake by myself. These incidents just happen too often to let me think it is always my fault.
But this can not be. I set up a colonizer with speed 1 plus an emergency prop. of 2. The colony is 2 sectors away, so it should be reached in one turn with the EP. Use EP, set colonize planet and where do I find it next turn? One sector adjacent to the source planet, but the EP is destroyed, great.
|
February 11th, 2003, 01:46 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
Not to be mean, but I already hate simultaneous turns, glad that happened to you and not me.
__________________
It's all just a perspective of matter.
|
February 11th, 2003, 01:55 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
In simultaneous turns for a ship with EP you must give the ship the "use comp" order before the other orders.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
February 11th, 2003, 03:46 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
Yeah, the orders are executed in the order you tell them, so it didn't use the emergency propulsion until it reached its first order's destination...
PvK
|
February 11th, 2003, 10:11 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bordesholm, Germany
Posts: 781
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
I am pretty sure I have used the correct order, I even have checked it in the view orders screen.
Is there a possible problem with quasi newtonian movement and the older proportions mod 2.4.x regarding EP's?
Tonight I will check it with this Version under turn based.
|
February 11th, 2003, 11:26 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
I just ran a test in 1.84 & Props 2.4.2 and didn't see a problem. I made a cruiser with efficient ion engines for usual speed 3, and strapped on Emergency Propulsion 5, gave orders to use the component and move, and it zoomed at speed 8, to 8 sectors away.
Hmm, I guess I should test with your colony ship example.
Ok, yep, I see the same thing. This would be a new bug discovery (congratulations...). Also, I don't understand what causes it. If I make a speed-3 colony ship with Emergency Propulsion II, and use it, it DOES go 5 sectors.
Let's try speed-1 and EmProp V... nope, same blown component and speed 1.
Ok, let's try a cruiser with speed 1 and EmProp V... nope, goes 1 and blows.
Seems like it is speed-1 ships. Let's try speed-2 ships with EmProp 5. ZOOoom... went 7 as hoped.
Testing with a speed-2 colony ship with EmProp 2 - goes 4 as expected.
Sooo... seems like there is a "feature/issue" wherein ships must have at least regular final speed 2 or more, or emergency propulsion won't work. I think the manual says somewhere that it has to have at least 1. So either it's a mistake, or I'm misremembering what the rules say.
PvK
|
February 11th, 2003, 03:13 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
This is just a guess on my part, but I wonder if the reason for this bug isn't that he programmed it so you can't use EP to accelerate a ship that is out of supply.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
February 11th, 2003, 10:50 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
You mean emergency propulsion *WORKS* in simultaneous games? Learn something new every day... weird that it would only work before the move orders, because then wouldn't the ship be at full movement and thus using the emergency propulsion wouldn't be able to give a ship more than its normal movement?
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|
February 12th, 2003, 12:53 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
Yes, that's exactly how it works. It gets more than it's normal movement. On the other hand, if you wait and give a move order first you in effect "lock in" the maximum movement for the turn.
It is possible to set your orders up and not do the EP first. But it has to be done extremly carefully. You have to plot a course that will not use up all your movement before the EP is used, but will be far enough away that after the EP is used you haven't gone past your original maximum for the turn. Much easier to just give the EP order first, then you don't have to worry about it.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
February 12th, 2003, 05:50 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: My problems with simultaneous
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
This is just a guess on my part, but I wonder if the reason for this bug isn't that he programmed it so you can't use EP to accelerate a ship that is out of supply.
Geoschmo
|
I know that the EP doesn't add supplies, but I don't think it should be designed that way. I would think that "Emergency Propulsion" should come with its own contained emergency supply of fuel. After all what good is an emergency engine with no gas?
Slick.
__________________
Slick.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|