|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
February 8th, 2013, 01:54 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
British OOB
Not sure if this has been mentioned already but would it be possible for formations 477 & 478 Light Rifle Co & Platoon to change the name of the Rifle Sections to something diffrent like Light Rifle so they are easy to tell apart from the standard squads which are also named Rifle Section.
If possible & space permits being able to purchase a Platoon of Light Rifle with the ability to purchase a diffrent type of varient in the 4th squad slot would be nice i.e
xx0 Support Squad
xx1 & xx2 Light Rifle Squad (full selection as is or just non RPG equiped versions)
xx3 Light Rifle Squad (just RPG versions)
This allows you to purchase 1 squad with an RPG for bunker busting & the occasional vehicle while keeping the others infantry based for the likes of Afganistan
__________________
John
|
February 8th, 2013, 08:09 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
Squads?!?
The tactical group is called a section. A random collection of blokes doing fatigues, square-bashing etc. is termed a squad. Hence the name 'squaddies' that the British soldiers ironically apply to themselves.
(Bet you can tell I got an ear-bashing from an NCO when I used the 'squad' term as a fluffy new guy back in the 1970s! )
Just choose one a support section that has a LAW such as ILAW (#621, say) when purchasing the formation. Or buy an inf-AT formation or 2 to attach to the company for bunker bashing duties?
Plus, when the new release comes out, if you have the full CD game then you can always use the 'change all' function in the campaign upgrade screen or scenario designer to change the support sections to one of the NATO formation style ones of your choice, in one easy mass replacement.
Cheers
Andy
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
February 8th, 2013, 06:00 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
Duly chastised
I know just dont like my leaders being the guy who has to come forward & take it out so adding inf-AT it will be.
Brit rifle sections are some of the best in the game & late era the support unit with the Cdo Mortar is a personal favorite when meeting groups of infantry or for his assist vs MGs & ATGMs
__________________
John
|
February 8th, 2013, 09:02 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
Then roll your own formations to suit your personal preference, you have Mobhack and that is what it is there for after all.
cheers
Andy
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
February 12th, 2013, 03:32 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
Ahhh the differences between American, British, and Canadian.
All speak the same language (more-or-less) but sometimes the same word has different meanings in each.
Keeps life interesting.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
April 22nd, 2013, 02:50 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: British OOB
On the aircraft front, we're missing the brave little DH Hornet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Hornet
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Gud For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 22nd, 2013, 06:06 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,297 Times in 973 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
I'll add this to my list. I think the HORNET would be a worthy addition if Don agrees. It has the production numbers, weapons and combat pedigree. The HORNET was the fastest twin engined fighter ever produced with a Max. Spd. of 472mph featuring new R/R Merlin Counter Rotating engines with a Max. Rng. of 3000mi. which is very impressive. Armament consisted of 4 Hispano 20mm cannons and ethier 2x1000lb. (RAF F.1) or 2x2000lb. (RAF F.3) bombs or 8 27kg rockets. The RN version the F.Mk20 is similiar to the RAF F.3. The RAF used the type to replace it's P-51 Squadrons and during the Maylaya Crisis it replaced the SPITFIRE and BEAUFIGHTER Squadrons with F.3. The type saw operational service from mid '46 to about the same time in '56. Many sites indicated it saw such service at the beginning of the "Jet Age" due to it's reliability, speed but most importantly due to it's extended range. The RAF F.3 & RN F.Mk20 has an added dorsel finlet on the tail, see Pic below.
Regards,
Pat
Last edited by FASTBOAT TOUGH; April 22nd, 2013 at 06:17 PM..
Reason: Rocket Fix.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FASTBOAT TOUGH For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 25th, 2014, 03:53 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,297 Times in 973 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
I needed this moved up front (Pg.1) so I can continue my work.
I believe these planes were bigger than the MOSQUITO.
Don posting pictures if you feel like getting ahead on the Icons.
Pics:
1. Pic is the RN version again the distinction being it has the dorsal fin which RAF MK1 didn't have. The LATER RAF types would have it.
2. This shows the counter rotation in the props that helped make this the fastest prop driven fighter ever made.
3. SEA HORNET bottom view.
4. RAF HORNET MK1
5. Side view drawings.
6. Going to bed...never mind, much much too frightening to see!?!
Picture...fortunately deleted.
One more thread to hunt.
Regards,
Pat
Last edited by FASTBOAT TOUGH; January 25th, 2014 at 04:19 AM..
|
January 25th, 2014, 09:33 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,495
Thanks: 3,966
Thanked 5,704 Times in 2,815 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
that was done months ago and they are already in a SHP file
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 25th, 2014, 10:49 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 366
Thanked 440 Times in 318 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB
Quote:
Originally Posted by FASTBOAT TOUGH
I believe these planes were bigger than the MOSQUITO.
|
Just FYI the hornet is quite a bit SMALLER than the Mossy (approx 3m/10feet shorter and wingspan also approx 3m/10feet narrower)
|
The Following User Says Thank You to scorpio_rocks For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|