|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e5da/9e5dadc92f0a48ae199504030251242e833a68e6" alt="Reply" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 03:15 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79788/79788b567c0a5fb72ac8d721c31e12bc4f2d392f" alt="stecal's Avatar" |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Turn order in Strategic Combat
What determines who moves first in strategic combat? It seems like my ships always go second no matter whether I iniatiated combat or not. This is especially painfull at warp points where my carriers often get blown up by enemy fire before they even get to launch their fighters. I am player 8 of 8 in a multiplayer, simultaneous game and I would hate to discover that is why I go Last
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 03:59 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
quote: Originally posted by Brainsucker:
... I am player 8 of 8 in a multiplayer, simultaneous game and I would hate to discover that is why I go Last
sorry, but i think that's exactly why you always start Last.
------------------
Q: When he went, had you gone and had she, if she wanted to and were able, for the time being excluding all the restraints on her not to go, gone also, would he have brought you, meaning you and she, with him to the station?
A: Objection. That question should be taken out and shot.
__________________
[Boo!]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 04:02 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
I hope that this things will be fixed soon ....
Liga
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 05:17 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9902d/9902db42bc3bbfe6c2de131b96728cc15642dd88" alt="Jubala's Avatar" |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Link�ping, �sterg�tland, Sweden
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
Yep, that kind of sucks. Means the enemy will always get in the first shot at warp points both when you are defending and attacking. Painful.
__________________
You don't go through the hardships of an ocean voyage to make friends...
You can make friends at home!
-Eric The Viking-
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 05:32 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 302
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
I think it would be a lot better if the attacking empire would get the first move always.
------------------
Visit the Spoogy Federation at:
http://spoogyfederation.tripod.com
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 05:44 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80863/808633f957c2ea12fef638148d4998a2fc1a74f1" alt="Taqwus's Avatar" |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
How about individual ship initiative, taking into account +hit bonus (which includes hull type, sensors, racial attributes, experience, and other modifiers), plus perhaps a modifier for traversing a warp point (perhaps a bonus to the defender), plus a random factor?
------------------
-- The thing that goes bump in the night
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 08:18 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5443e/5443ef384cca5162537f60fdfb007f95a1face0b" alt="mac5732's Avatar" |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,951
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
I disagree with the part about warp points. When you go thru one you never know what is on the other side. therefore when you go thru and the other player has defenses set up on warp point it only makes sense that he would get lst shot. That's why you should send in scout see what defenses and their strenght before you send thru your fleet. This forces you to reorganize your fleets to meet and defeat his defenses. As for reg combat in systems, I always notice that it doesn't matter who fires first, its who moves into range lst. Therefore who comes in range lst, fires first. I would suggest you use tactical at least for large or important battles that way you could move so you always would get the lst shot.
just some ideas mac
__________________
just some ideas Mac
BEWARE; crochety old geezers play SE4, in between bathroom runs
Phong's Head Parking
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 12th, 2001, 08:28 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Procyon III
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
You can't use tatical combat in simultaneous games.
__________________
Grand Admiral Dravis
------------------
We are all bound by our experiences. They are the limits of our consciousness.
But in the end the human soul will ever reach for the truth...
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 13th, 2001, 12:02 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09ab5/09ab51b398e5e5667749fc9644a4a5cf95df9715" alt="Will's Avatar" |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Emeryville, CA
Posts: 1,412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
Not to mention the fact that it's a multiplayer, so still no TC.
__________________
GEEK CODE V.3.12: GCS/E d-- s: a-- C++ US+ P+ L++ E--- W+++ N+ !o? K- w-- !O M++ V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5++ X R !tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G+ e+++ h !r*-- y?
SE4 CODE: A-- Se+++* GdY $?/++ Fr! C++* Css Sf Ai Au- M+ MpN S Ss- RV Pw- Fq-- Nd Rp+ G- Mm++ Bb@ Tcp- L+
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
June 13th, 2001, 03:41 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA USA
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn order in Strategic Combat
This is really bad news. It means that all those fire once every 3-4 turn shield/armor skipping weapons will rip the guts out of your ships if you both start in close proximity as usuall at a warp point.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|