|
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2007, 10:42 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Another experimental game
This will be done with 6 players on a map, modified like I always modify them, with my usual settings (slightly rich across the board.)
The players will be arranged thusly (with wrap-around on both sides)
1 2 3
4 5 6
The goal is to wipe out all adjacent players. Thus - 1 wins when 2,3 and 4 are eliminated, 5 wins when 2,4 and 6 are eliminated, and so forth.
A joint win is possible - if 1,3 and 6 are the only players left, when 3 is eliminated, 1 and 6 get a joint win.
The idea is that, if we cannot eliminate diplomacy, we can at least fix the alliances before play begins. The friend-of my friend-is my foe set up allows the game to retain a certain level of tension.
Thoughts?
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
February 16th, 2007, 11:17 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
Everyone gets three enemies and two allies?
Interesting.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
February 17th, 2007, 03:03 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
I like this idea. It will definitely make for an interesting game. I'd like to be a prt of it.
|
February 17th, 2007, 04:06 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 559
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
Deleted.
|
February 17th, 2007, 04:12 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: N. California
Posts: 624
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
Good idea
|
February 17th, 2007, 04:21 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
Sounds like a really great idea Dr Praetorious.
I very much like the fact you have definite enemies and allies.
However, all Dom3 nations are not exactly balanced vs each another which could be a problem. Helheim vs Marverni for example.
Also it does favour diplomacy/co-operation very, very strongly. Example if 1&5 work closely together to eliminate 2, well 4&6 don't bother with diplomacy. Well 1&5 have a huge advantage.
|
February 17th, 2007, 05:49 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
There are several nations which are somewhat weak, especially on face-hugger maps. Marverni is, in spite of their excellent mages, I think probably the weakest EA position overall. Ermor also has excellent mages and their military is much better.
Incidentally, this is my face-hugging scale for EA. Water nations are a distinct category.
(Most face-hugging)
Niefelheim
Helheim
Abysia
Mictlan
Lanka
Agartha
Sauromatia
Vanheim
Yomi
Pangaea
Arcoscephale
T'ien Ch'i
Kailasa
Caelum
Ermor
Ulm
C'tis
Marverni
(Least face-hugging)
Okay, baseline - T'ien Ch'i is not that good a face hugger, but as T'ien Ch'i you have a respectable chance of repeling any rush. Maybe not a 50:50 chance, but you have a real chance of winning so that's okay.
So even in a hate-your-neighbors situation like this, there are 13 perfectly respectable positions to play. I don't see a problem.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
February 17th, 2007, 06:16 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
Yea, I pretty much agree with your face-hugging list or alternatively most powerful to weakest EA nations, my list would be similar to yours. Although later in the game alot of those lower down become the most powerful later on, like T'ien Ch'i, if they can survive the early game.
I suppose map size will influence nation selection.
|
February 17th, 2007, 09:52 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
At the risk of being called a noob, might I ask what "face hugging" means?
|
February 17th, 2007, 09:59 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Another experimental game
Face huggers are the things that come out of the eggs in Alien (the movie.)
So, if you are "face hugging", the first thing you see, you indiscriminately attack it.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|