|
|
|
|
July 19th, 2004, 04:40 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
sequence of events question
Sorry if this is asked and answered, but I could not find it in the FAQ. Do defenders always go first? I have a wizard who absolutely must cast a spell before dying. I'd like to put him up front, for maximum effect. But, if there is any chance that attackers can fire first, I will place him in the back.
More generally, where can I find out about sequence of events?
Thanks,
Merry
|
July 19th, 2004, 04:48 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: sequence of events question
I'd risk saying that defenders *always* go first. But I don't know where to look for proof, it's pure empirical observation: I have never seen an attacker go first.
|
July 19th, 2004, 05:02 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 471
Thanks: 23
Thanked 28 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Re: sequence of events question
I'm with TinkThank. I've have never experienced that the attacker gets the first move. But I wondering how much diffrent it really does to get the first move. Sure you get the first chance to buff your wizards or casting the first fireball, but the distances are to great for precision to be 100% accurate (If not your wizard got very high Pre).
best regards
Thilock
[ July 19, 2004, 16:03: Message edited by: Thilock_Dominus ]
|
July 19th, 2004, 05:08 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: sequence of events question
Going first could be decisive, e.g. if you want your wizard to cast a summoning spell or a battlefield enchantment before he dies.
|
July 19th, 2004, 05:17 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 471
Thanks: 23
Thanked 28 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Re: sequence of events question
Wouldn't it be better to set your wizard a little back with some heavy armored bodyguards, and then some units decoys in must front to take arrows and cavelry attack?
|
July 19th, 2004, 09:04 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: sequence of events question
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
I'd risk saying that defenders *always* go first. But I don't know where to look for proof, it's pure empirical observation: I have never seen an attacker go first.
|
Truth. The defender always goes first, without fail. The only time you'd ever think the attacker went first is if the defender was intentionally scripted to hold its first turn, so it didn't do anything on that turn.
Quote:
Originally posted by Thilock_Dominus:
I'm with TinkThank. I've have never experienced that the attacker gets the first move. But I wondering how much diffrent it really does to get the first move. Sure you get the first chance to buff your wizards or casting the first fireball, but the distances are to great for precision to be 100% accurate (If not your wizard got very high Pre).
|
Going first can mean the difference between an easy victory and a gruesome bloodbath. You'll never doubt the power of moving first when you're facing an assrape of devils piling on you and killing your mages before they can even do anything.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|