|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e5da/9e5dadc92f0a48ae199504030251242e833a68e6" alt="Reply" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 01:45 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fürth, Germany
Posts: 384
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
tactic vs underwater
since i'm mostly playing ulm (have to, i live there data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3846b/3846b9b68ffbcac592ff77a022b4c38326e3f177" alt="" ), i have a problem when facing underwater nations (espacially r'lyeh). i can repel their attacks, throw them back into the sea if they conquer one of my provinces.
but i want to take the battle to them. ulm (at least with my setup) isn't that good at magic. i usually go with earth and fire magic, which gives some good items, and fire magic helps in land battles. underwater of course it's nearly useless.
conquering an amphibian inhabited province seems the best way so far. i'm curious whether there are better ways. would empowering work? give a commander or spellcasting mercenary water magic?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 04:34 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3081/f3081466cf7c884e67b992226ddc96f8d948a2ea" alt="NTJedi's Avatar" |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
If your Ulm and fighting an enemy from underwater then I suggest you invest in either Air, Water or Death magic. These magics will allow ways for you to fight back... either by creating items or casting spells.
conquering an amphibian inhabited province will take many turns to raise an army.
[ December 16, 2003, 14:35: Message edited by: NTJedi ]
__________________
There can be only one.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 05:11 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7eec/b7eec862faee40470df422f3363ce83d5ddbbe24" alt="ywl's Avatar" |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 296
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by reverend:
since i'm mostly playing ulm (have to, i live there ), i have a problem when facing underwater nations (espacially r'lyeh). i can repel their attacks, throw them back into the sea if they conquer one of my provinces.
but i want to take the battle to them. ulm (at least with my setup) isn't that good at magic. i usually go with earth and fire magic, which gives some good items, and fire magic helps in land battles. underwater of course it's nearly useless.
conquering an amphibian inhabited province seems the best way so far. i'm curious whether there are better ways. would empowering work? give a commander or spellcasting mercenary water magic?
|
Crusher and the Clockwork Horror should be amphibian though they might fight well enough.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 05:25 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5af3f/5af3f7482c14ff5de42fc13a240996fce34b0425" alt="Gandalf Parker's Avatar" |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Most water units fight badly (if at all) on land. And land units tend to fight badly in water. What I tend to do is build an army that can go into the water (constructs, undead, shamblers, whatever) and when a water-capable set of mercs come up I let that decide my timing.
I try to take one out of the way spot so I can start building up WATER units there. Dont keep marching forward and spread yourself too thin. It works best to try and take water provinces with water units.
Remember that any mage with a water magic skill can enter the water. If it has more than one water magic it can take another ait-breather (1 for each water point) with him.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 05:57 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/730a7/730a7228bb0a865c52803be198115ec736d53ece" alt="Teraswaerto's Avatar" |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
Most water units fight badly (if at all) on land.
|
I think illithids would disagree with this statement. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef180/ef1800ef1fd2aa989c10d27542a5849afd4cfebb" alt=""
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 06:08 PM
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Golems do very well against the Squiddies, investing in a few of those to get a foothold works very well. Remember when fighting Squiddies; it's the numbers that really matter. If they can mind bLast 50 'elite' units and you only have 75, you are fairly bad off. However, if they can mind bLast 50 and you have 200 trash units, you'll win nearly every time.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 07:04 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7eec/b7eec862faee40470df422f3363ce83d5ddbbe24" alt="ywl's Avatar" |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 296
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by Zen:
Golems do very well against the Squiddies, investing in a few of those to get a foothold works very well. Remember when fighting Squiddies; it's the numbers that really matter. If they can mind bLast 50 'elite' units and you only have 75, you are fairly bad off. However, if they can mind bLast 50 and you have 200 trash units, you'll win nearly every time.
|
Golem is good - obviously.
Golem needs Astral. Something that a "magically poor" Ulm doesn't usually have. It also needs Construction 7, comparing to Crusher and Clockwork Horrors at Construction 5. And also, Golem is susceptible to Mind Duel of R'lyeh. It's fine versus computer but could be dangerous if it's against human.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 07:10 PM
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Yes, the reason I said Golem is because they are 'little SC's vs Squiddies and when taking on any underwater any nation you will have alot of provinces that can attack your coastal lands and you can attack as well.
Also Golem is a Commander, so it does not need a commander to drive him around; which is one issue that you will find with armies of Crushers and Clockworks; if their mage commander(s) die (because he's the only thing with a mind, so all the Squids target them) they all die too data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3a92/c3a92bb9bc5dd8d914aeada38d34cfb9d02935a5" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 09:48 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fürth, Germany
Posts: 384
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
great input!
hadn't really thought of constructs / golems. shows how much i still have to learn. (only got the game yesterday)
Quote:
Remember that any mage with a water magic skill can enter the water. If it has more than one water magic it can take another ait-breather (1 for each water point) with him.
|
does this include empowered spies? one scuba-diving scout should help determine where to attack with the rest of the army. the construct approach sounds good since i'm researching construction anyway, but i think i'll go with masses of shamblers. never really had a gold problem, and they cost only 1 resource per unit. should be enough to form the bridgehead. (or whatever they call it underwater )
and, yes, this is vs. AI.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 16th, 2003, 10:12 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Reverend,
Empowerment costs 50 gems for the first level of skill.
It might be better to empower another mage if you have no one skilled in water...and then just give shambler skin armor to your spy.
I like the armor for unarmored units because it gives a bit of protection and costs the same as a water breathing ring. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7097/f709735434ef324d8925aa2a1cbd192dee9f6818" alt="" Not that protection will help your scout much if he's discovered.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|