|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2016, 02:11 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 168
Thanks: 21
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Swiss OOB
Some news from the Swiss Army. For the next few years it is planned to buy three new shoulder launched AT weapons. (Introduction 2017-2019)
Heat and Hesh RGW 90 HH (300m)
Next Generation Light Anti-Tank Weapon NLAW (800m)
Light Anti-Armor Weapon M72 LAW Mk2 (200m)
Does anyone know, if they are modelled in the game allready, so I could copy them over to the Swiss oob?
The closest I found is in the British oob, the NLAW, but the range looks different. They have 12(=600m), the Swiss page states 800m (=16) - and thats NOT the Maximum distance.
source
http://www.vbs.admin.ch/internet/vbs...n/ab16/rp.html
also interesting new Patrolboat and 12cm Mortar System (for Pirhana 8x8)
__________________
make love not war..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Pats For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 22nd, 2016, 09:44 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Swiss OOB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pats
Light Anti-Armor Weapon M72 LAW Mk2 (200m)
|
While the M72 LAW had undergone many upgrades over the years (up to about the M72A7 version now) the overall range, accuracy, and penetration have been little effected. So just grab one off the USA or USMC OOB.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Suhiir For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 23rd, 2016, 12:17 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 168
Thanks: 21
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Swiss OOB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pats
Light Anti-Armor Weapon M72 LAW Mk2 (200m)
|
While the M72 LAW had undergone many upgrades over the years (up to about the M72A7 version now) the overall range, accuracy, and penetration have been little effected. So just grab one off the USA or USMC OOB.
|
What about the Australian (obat15) M72 ILAW (Weapon 17)?
It has higher penetration and range (35/7 compare to 30/4) any idea what "model" that is?
|
April 24th, 2016, 12:35 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,297 Times in 973 Posts
|
|
Re: Swiss OOB
I wish they were all this easy! The ADF uses the 4. M72 LAW (66MM M72A6 LDSFW). If you would like to use one, the ref below will make it possible well, probably not really however, it's listed under the " JOB DETAILS" section.
http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/army/j...mouredCavalry/
The bonus in this ref is it gives use their specific and current armored vehicles.
Loved the ADF actually had a military POC @ MOD that helped sort out many issues concerning armored formations, info on the LEOPARD retirement/status when they received their "new" M1A1 tanks and more. They were most helpful and I'm very grateful for their assistance as we were starting to run into roadblocks concerning "good" data. I think this was about four years ago. We made many fixes off the emails sent back to me which I believe I posted in here at the time or in the ADF Thread. Still have them in my box because you just never know!?!
Time to chill out!!
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
Last edited by FASTBOAT TOUGH; April 24th, 2016 at 12:43 AM..
|
April 26th, 2016, 12:28 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Swiss OOB
The M72 LAAW and M136 AT-4 are entirely different animals in spite of their many similarities.
The M72 is still used because it's cheap and pretty darn effective vs things like machinegun nests and lightly/unarmored vehicles, the US doesn't use the RPG-7 (tho the USMC uses the SMAW) so needs something to fulfill that particular role. It's slightly lighter and less expensive then the AT-4 which tends to be somewhat more of a "real" anti-tank weapon and has much better sights (in fact the most recent variant has rails so you can mount a telescopic, red-dot, or night-vision sight).
Besides, there are still thousands of M72s still in stock, may as well use them!
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|