.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

The Star & the Crescent- Save $9.00
winSPWW2- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT > Campaigns, Scenarios & Maps
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd, 2014, 06:41 PM
Tomas's Avatar

Tomas Tomas is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 50
Thanks: 42
Thanked 49 Times in 21 Posts
Tomas is on a distinguished road
Default Zhalanashkol Incident

To finish the Soviet/Chinese conflict, here's the last incident that happened during these border clashes.



Quote:
Zhalanashkol Incident
Date: August 13, 1969
Battle Location: Near Lake Zhalanashkol, Kazakh SSR
Battle Type: Soviet assault vs PRC defend

Description: The battle takes place near the Soviet-Chinese border, few kilometers deep in the Soviet territory. On morning 13th several PRC infantry squads cross the border, achieve the Kamenaya and Pravaya peaks and start to fortify their positions.

Short argument between the Soviet troops and PRC units doesn't solves anything and border guards leave the scene to wait for reinforcements. After arrival of Soviet BTRs and hard fight, overhelmed PRC troops retreat. One of the key factors that decided the out come of the battle was absence of AT weaponry on
PRC side, since they didn't anticipated presence of Soviet IFVs in the region.

Notes: If played against the AI the human player should take the Soviet side.

Sources: A. Musalov, Damansky and Zhalanashkol, Moscow 2005.
This is small and short scenario, as the actual incident involved only few units. Should be suitable for reasonable PBEM aswell.

Any comments, improvement ideas and so on are more than welcome.

EDIT: Final version is attached.

Changes:
- Scenario is bit longer now (30 turns)
- China tries to reinforce their positions (as it was historically)
- Mi-4 instead of Mi-2 for Soviets
- Fixed VPs
- Some other minor stuff
Attached Files
File Type: zip Zhalanashakol Incident.zip (78.3 KB, 244 views)

Last edited by Tomas; December 8th, 2014 at 12:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tomas For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old November 3rd, 2014, 08:11 PM
shahadi's Avatar

shahadi shahadi is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me.
Posts: 878
Thanks: 584
Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
shahadi is on a distinguished road
Arrow Re: Zhalanashkol Incident

Okay, I'll take a look at this one as well and report back promptly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 4th, 2014, 06:33 AM

Warhero Warhero is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 570
Thanks: 2
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
Warhero is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Zhalanashkol Incident

Thanks.

Btw, how about India/China war/skirmishes 1962 battles?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Warhero For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old November 10th, 2014, 08:14 PM
shahadi's Avatar

shahadi shahadi is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me.
Posts: 878
Thanks: 584
Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
shahadi is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Re: Zhalanashkol Incident

Quote:
Originally Posted by shahadi View Post
Okay, I'll take a look at this one as well and report back promptly.
I found this scenario of excellent scope requiring thoughtful battle planning. The terrain and balance of forces are consequential and required patience. Therefore, I used my vehicles in over watch positions to pound the Chinese mercilessly with suppression fires from multiple vehicles. Moreover, I left the roads immediately after plotting an approach to the Chinese positions that was clear of rough terrain and at an approach that limited the Chinese fire zones.

A few suggestions are in order:
  1. The Force HQ formation leaders on both sides are too high and should be no more than 2nd Lieutenants with a formation appropriate to that rank, say a Guards Platoon or something similar, rather than a battalion.
  2. There were no flag values, I would have liked to have Victory Flag values.
  3. Although, it is not required in our game, I prefer HQ units in my formations of say 3 men for a platoon and more for higher units.

Overall, the scenario an entertaining experience.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shahadi For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old December 8th, 2014, 12:26 PM
Tomas's Avatar

Tomas Tomas is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 50
Thanks: 42
Thanked 49 Times in 21 Posts
Tomas is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Zhalanashkol Incident

Uploaded the fixed version!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tomas For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.