|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2010, 02:31 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 181
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Priest question
I can't seem to figure out what is meant by "some priests can use this to sacrifice slaves" (not an exact quote).
If I wanted to use a Jade knife I take it
A. I would have to use a Blood mage.
B. I would use a Jade knife so I can sacrifice 3 slaves.
seems easy...My trouble is playing a nation like Sauro, I can't figure out what Priests would have Blood that I can use the Jade knife with...While Witch Kings are Sacred, they are not priests.
Do I have to empower some other priest in Blood to do this, or am I just missing the obvious (as usual)
|
December 21st, 2010, 02:46 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,735
Thanks: 272
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
Not all nations can blood sacrifice. And you need a priest, not a mage to do so.
Give the priest some slaves in his/her inventory. Set the command to blood sacrifice.
A priest can sac up to his/her priest level. A jade knife only adds to that lvl (So it can sac priestlvl+3 slaves). It will not give the ability to any priest who didn't have that one before.
|
December 21st, 2010, 02:46 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
It doesn't actually take blood magic, it takes holy magic. So literally any priest can blood sacrifice. Priests with more holy magic are better blood sacrificers. Also not all nations can blood sacrifice.
Edit: blasted ninjaing ninjas.
__________________
"Easy-slay(TM) is a whole new way of marketing violence. It cuts down on all the red tape and just butchers people. As a long-time savagery enthusiast myself, I'm very excited about the synergies that the easy-slay(TM) approach brings to the entire enterprise." -Dr DrP
|
December 21st, 2010, 03:22 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas/Ohio
Posts: 363
Thanks: 11
Thanked 72 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
It would be more accurate to say only a handful of nations can blood sacrifice.
Early and Late Mictlan, Vanheim, Abyssia, Maverni, any 'heim giant nation, Late Marignon, and maybe some others I cannot recall off the top of my head.
|
December 21st, 2010, 03:59 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 712
Thanks: 5
Thanked 40 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
you missed Sauromatia, Bogarus, Hinnom and Gath(not 100% certain about them) and 1 or 2 of the Pangaeas(don't remember if it's only 1 that can't or can blood sac and which 1 it is). maybe a few others too. generally there are quite a few nations that can blood sac, especially in LA, so it's not too rare. in MA it's only Aby and Vanheim that can do it, so for that age it's quite rare, but in EA and LA there are plenty of nations that can do it.
|
December 21st, 2010, 04:05 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,735
Thanks: 272
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
And Jotunheim cannot blood sac. (neither can Niefel, or Utgard).
Same for Bogarus, a blood nation, but not blood sacrificing nation.
Not all nations with access to blood can blood sac.
|
December 21st, 2010, 05:37 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
Lol, this is starting to remind me of a recent episode on the other forum and IRC, where one super awesome vet and self proclaimed source of all knowledge was saying just about every nation in the game could blood sac :
Anyway, here is a complete list of all the nations that can blood sac that I compiled about a year or so ago. If a nation isn't on this list, then it can't blood sac (unless I've screwed up and left one off, but it looks about right)
Early Age
Abysia
Helheim
Hinnom
Marverni
Mictlan
Pangaea
Sauromatia
Vanheim
Middle Age
Abysia
Vanheim
Late Age
Abysia
Gath
Marignon
Mictlan
Midgard
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calahan For This Useful Post:
|
|
December 22nd, 2010, 12:27 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Priest question
Can confirm MA is correct.
Not noticing any ommissions for the other eras, but i might also be forgetting one.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|