|
|
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:03 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
The in joke is that Sombre has been banned from the forums. So if you read something today and didn't quite get it, it's probably about that in some form or another.
__________________
"Easy-slay(TM) is a whole new way of marketing violence. It cuts down on all the red tape and just butchers people. As a long-time savagery enthusiast myself, I'm very excited about the synergies that the easy-slay(TM) approach brings to the entire enterprise." -Dr DrP
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rdonj For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:10 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 518
Thanks: 26
Thanked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Bull pucker! I have read and reread the rules. In no way did I violate them.
I may have pushed them to extreme limits.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:12 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 518
Thanks: 26
Thanked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Oh Peter don't feel too bad. I rarely post anything worth reading. Those who really know me don't bother reading my crap.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:14 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 104
Thanks: 3
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ebbesen
And now for actually being sombre for a moment: I appreciate the Dom3 forum because it is usually a helpful place, where people stick to discussing topics related to the game in the appropriate subforums until being banned. When somebody has a problem, he can post about it and people will try to help.
I despise the sort of in-jokes that I never get like the OP posted in three (or more?) different threads all including the word "sombre", which has the rest of you who are "in" on it in stiches, trolling this whine and finding it highly amusing that people actually tried to cry answers based on what the OP wrote in his first post. We've ended up with a five pages (and growing) thread where probably only Verjigorm, Graeme Dice, chrispedersen, and Radio_Star are not in violation of the forum rules and with a signal to noise ratio so low that it is nearly sombre.
And if that seemed excessively pointless for some of you, well, so mote it be. I can only hope that this and Maerlande's other recent threads earn a temporary ban and not a sign of things to come.
|
Wait, I'm not in violation? "Moderation in moderation" doesn't cross the line?
What's a guy gotta do to get banned around here, anyway?
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:15 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 481
Thanks: 42
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
So this is some kind of protest? Perhaps a little background would be useful. All I got so far is that Sombre (a frequent, fairly useful, sometimes acerbic, contributor here) got banned for some unknown reason, and that plenty of folks are upset.
Is it a genuine jerk move by the Forum mods? If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:15 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 149
Thanks: 49
Thanked 15 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Just be Sombre. Be very sombre.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:15 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio_Star
What's a guy gotta do to get banned around here, anyway?
|
Does that qualify as questioning the rules? If so... maybe you'll soon be Sombre too.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:16 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
So this is some kind of protest? Perhaps a little background would be useful. All I got so far is that Sombre (a frequent, fairly useful, sometimes acerbic, contributor here) got banned for some unknown reason, and that plenty of folks are upset.
Is it a genuine jerk move by the Forum mods? If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
I sombrely submit it would violate forum rules. See the scenario + mod forum thread on the subject.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:17 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,735
Thanks: 272
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
It is against rules. And we also don't want to violate Sombre's privacy.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:18 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 868
Thanks: 56
Thanked 42 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
So this is some kind of protest? Perhaps a little background would be useful. All I got so far is that Sombre (a frequent, fairly useful, sometimes acerbic, contributor here) got banned for some unknown reason, and that plenty of folks are upset.
Is it a genuine jerk move by the Forum mods? If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
well yes i suppose. And our benevolent Mods have kindly declined to tell us their side of why a very helpful member got perma banned (which violates their forum rules btw since he didn't get the two temp bans).
or better yet read here: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=45498
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|