|
|
|
|
 |
|
April 7th, 2008, 03:39 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Here's my mage-only battle formation. This is for when the enemy is using supercombatants or other mage-only armies in which normal units would die in seconds. |
May 15th, 2008, 08:56 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
In reply to the American Football comparison with Rugby....
As a Linebacker in college and a Flanker in Rugby at the present I would like to submit this comparison I have heard before.
Soccer...A gentlemens sport played by Ruffians
Rugby....A Ruffians sport played by Gentlemen
American football...A Ruffians sport played by Ruffians
Having no foot skills of my own I can't answer for soccer, but after playing American Football for 12 years and Rugby for almost 30 years (sigh...yes I am that old), I prefer to play the Grand 'ol' hybrid game of THUGBY or "Hit to Kill" and run faster than the opponent!!
|
May 15th, 2008, 09:21 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Quote:
Argitoth said:
Here's my mage-only battle formation. This is for when the enemy is using supercombatants or other mage-only armies in which normal units would die in seconds.
|
Hmm, I think cavalry flanking with 'attack rear' orders might cause some problems, unless the mages retreated quickly. |
May 16th, 2008, 03:56 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Well, as for the American football analogy, I can only say that if you are facing 300 pound monsters that have used steroids and hgh growth hormone for the last 10 to 15 years, I think I would want to have on as much pads/armor as possible.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
May 16th, 2008, 07:41 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: country of stinky fromages
Posts: 564
Thanks: 29
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
I don't know for how long rugby player will continue without protection : professional players have surprisingly enlarged those past years, and they are only getting bigger : must be what Darwin called natural evolution...
__________________
10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
Senior member of the GLIN !
|
May 16th, 2008, 11:19 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 887
Thanks: 144
Thanked 40 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Quote:
Humakty said:
must be what Darwin called natural evolution...
|
.. or "unnatural". 
-SSJ
__________________
"I think, therefore I am" - René Descartes
"I yam what I yam" - Popeye
|
May 20th, 2008, 01:45 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Quote:
NTJedi said:
Quote:
vfb said:
I think the grid is this size, please correct me if this is wrong.
((IMAGE))
|
The battlefield grid actually grows depending on the size of the attacking and defending army.
|
When does the battlefield grid grow? I've run in debug mode and it seems even with fairly large 500 unit battles the grid is still roughly 30X60. Debug mode gives the labeled grid coordinates on an x,y basis, btw. |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
