.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Shrapnel General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old July 15th, 2005, 05:35 PM
Annette's Avatar

Annette Annette is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 22
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Annette is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Shrapnel to Take on Wargamer.com?

Quote:
geodetic said:
Interesting thread. As a reader of games reviews (with a little experience of writing them too) I've always felt that one of the most useful and trust-cultivating features a review site can offer is a prominent 'reviewer's track-record' section embedded in every review.

This section would contain info on and links to the previous 5? 10? reviews that writer had produced for the site. A hypothetical example:

I'm reading a review of Operation Bent Javelin on www.grogland.com. It's written by Ivor Chiponmyshoulder. One click away from this review is a list revealing that Ivor has written 13 reviews for Grogland of which the last 10 were:

Storm Over Suez (Detonation Software) 88%
Kursk '43 (Powder Monkey Games) 15%
Mailed Fist (Detonation Software) 95%
Viking Raiders (Powder Monkey Games) 23%
The Washing of the Spears (Hex House) 55%
Vimy Ridge (Hex House) 62%
Spitfire Summer (Inferno Interactive) 68%
The Battle of Omdurman (Detonation Software) 87%
Waterloo 3D (Inferno Interactive) 71%
Austerlitz 3D (Inferno Interactive) 73%

(In the event that scores aren't used then links would have to suffice)

Naturally I've played a few of the titles on this list and can compare Ivor's analysis with my own. In no time at all I can see whether Ivor is a reviewer I can trust and relate to.

Speculating about a site's bias or lack of it is ultimately pointless as nothing can ever be proved. At the end of the day the reviewer's (ergo, the site's) track-record tell you everything you need to know about their trustworthiness/competence.
I think this is a great suggestion and hope to see it incorporated into The Gaming News format. Thanks for your input.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old September 21st, 2005, 04:57 PM

Curt Pangracs Curt Pangracs is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,023
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Curt Pangracs is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Shrapnel to Take on Wargamer.com?

I've been scanning this thread for the first time, and only one thing comes to mind:

"We despise that which we don't understnd!"

I would also like to point out that a review is, in fact, a personal opinion, especially when done by someone who has never created a game, or deeper still, has never created a game in the genre being reviewed!

Opinions are, indeed, like, noses - everyone has one, some just "smell" better than others!

Have a great day, all!!
__________________
Curt Pangracs
Designer
Raging Tiger and The Star and the Crescent
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.