Sermon of Courage instead of Fanatacism?

[PhilD]

Originally posted by Nagot Gick Fel:
I remember someone from IW once said SoC _might_ be more effective than Fanaticism wrt morale failure, although he wasn't 100% sure of this. If this is true, there would be a good reason to pick SoC over Fanaticism in special cases.

There may be a valid reason, or there may not be one, but does the spell AI know the truth?

Actually, that's a question of how the battle AI chooses actions - does it "know" the rules, and base its decisions on them, or does it have more or less fixed appreciations of each spells?

If one were to mod a spell's effects (I don't think that is possible right now), would that change the battle AI's use of it?

I believe the same question can be asked of modding spell costs/levels, and the strat AI's "liking" of research options. If, say, all Conjuration spells were to have their costs and path requirements increased, would the AI still research Conjuration as much?

(hard to test without access to the source code, since it isn't easy to decide what the AI has already researched)