|
|
|
|
 |
|
May 11th, 2004, 01:41 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
It's too bad that you can not have anonymous graphs. That would be nice that way you could know how you were doing, but could not beat on the big bad guy.
All right if we are voting I guess my vote has to be for of..
Oh and I'll ask for something else while I am at it how about cranking up the magic sites ratio? I kind of like the high gem income kind of game without having to resort to "tricks."
Heck we can even out-law "tricks" if we want to. It seems like a lot of games around here do.
|
May 11th, 2004, 01:47 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
Ok, it sounds like enough ppl are voting to turn graphs off. I'll turn em off.
re: higher ratio of magic sites. I'd like to leave it at normal so that we don't end up with tons and tons of global enchanments and general badness happening too fast.
re: tricks. I don't know what they all are but it seems like it would be tough to enforce a "no tricks" rule because it's pretty open-ended and how would we even know what was being done?
We've outlawed Vampire Queen (VQ) pretenders which should help?
If you want to propose outlawing something elese and you know how to define what you are outlawing, and most games outlaw it then suggest it.
Best,
John
|
May 11th, 2004, 02:12 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
*sigh*
well I guess I should mention clams...
*sigh*
They really are pretty darn good.
They are kind of the reason why I want more magic sites. If we outlaw clams then more magic sites are ok.
Or we could keep clams. It's not like we can enforce the rule ( but we can be pretty darn peeved if someone uses them ).
|
May 11th, 2004, 02:12 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
*sigh*
well I guess I should mention clams...
*sigh*
They really are pretty darn good.
They are kind of the reason why I want more magic sites. If we outlaw clams then more magic sites are ok.
Or we could keep clams. It's not like we can enforce the rule ( but we can be pretty darn peeved if someone uses them ).
|
May 11th, 2004, 02:24 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
How about we keep clams, but have a maximum of about 5? Could something like that work? Clams would be okay as long as people don't go crazy and build 20 of them or something. I don't know how you would police it, but you couldn't police a no-clam rule, either.
|
May 11th, 2004, 02:43 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
Ok, well, let's just go on an honor system that no one can build more than 5 clams I guess. Let's leave magic sites at default - that is still a lot of gems available I think. On a map of 154 provinces we might each expect to expand to hold about 19 provinces without any wars.
Regds,
John
|
May 11th, 2004, 06:50 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: M�nster, Germany
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Colorado Newbie game starting (hopefully)
By clams you mean clam of pearl?
__________________
Algebraic geometry seems to have acquired the reputation of being esoteric, exclusive, and very abstract, with adherents who are secretly plotting to take over all the rest of mathematics. In one respect this Last point is accurate. --David Mumford
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
