Quote:
Imperator Fyron said:
> "What's more, as long as those projects are incomplete
> they are vulnerable to intel attacks. Best to get them
> out of the labs and into production asap."
What about after turn one, where you have 50k in one project? The divide evenly method would only have 12.5k lost in one project.
|
Yes, for that one turn (in this example) you risk losing more points. However, as time goes on, the partially-complette "divide equally" projects become more of a liability. Watch:
Turn 1:
Div- 4*12500
con- 1*50000
More to lose from Concentrated research
Turn 2:
Div- 4*25000
con- 1st project complete! No outstanding points.
More to lose from Divided research.
Turn 3:
Div- 4*37500
con- 1*50000
More to lose from Concentrated research
Turn 4:
Div- 4*50000
con- 2nd project complete! No outstanding points.
More to lose from Divided research.
Turn 5:
Div- 4*67500
Con- 1*50000
More to lose from Divided research.
Turn 6:
Div- 4*75000
con- 3rd project complete! No outstanding points.
More to lose from Divided research.
Turn 7:
Div- 4*87500
Con- 1*50000
More to lose from Divided research.
Turn 8:
Div- All projects complete
Con- All projects complete
nothing to lose
Of course, this is just the breakdown for my rather simplistic and symetrical example. You'd need some more hardcore number crunching to figure out how it balances for more complex scenarios. I guess if your enemy has broken down your intel defences and you're getting hit every turn then theoretically you'd be better off not keeping your eggs in one basket. By keeping a large amount of projects open on divided research you might just get a few of them through to maturity. But if you're letting enemy intel through every turn, I'd say you're pretty much screwed no matter what you do. (And your enemy would be far better hitting you with a combination of counter-counter-intel and economic sabotage/ crew insurrection/ PPP than measly research sabotage.)