|
|
|
|
 |
|
June 17th, 2008, 06:59 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 437
Thanks: 18
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
450 gold for said gems  |
June 17th, 2008, 07:55 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
LOL, this is fun.
470
|
June 17th, 2008, 08:56 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 437
Thanks: 18
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
471  |
June 17th, 2008, 10:43 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
480 |
June 17th, 2008, 10:52 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
I should perhaps have fixed a minimum increment.  |
June 17th, 2008, 11:48 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
481.5!!!!
jazzepi
|
June 17th, 2008, 12:14 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
The last offer isn't recievable as the .5 can't be paid. 
Gems allocated to Patala for 480g. |
June 17th, 2008, 12:25 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
I demand a recount! The .5 was a hanging chad!
Jazzepi
|
June 17th, 2008, 12:55 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
Blah, I'll pay 500g. 18.5g for honorable factor 
Mighty Utgard, do we make the trade this turn? |
June 17th, 2008, 01:08 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Bid for d gems
Yes.
@Jazzepi Giant lawyers say : Biding was stated to be "in gold" not in chads or copper pieces.
More seriously, a last minute +1 when WL which seemed motivated and made several serious offers was probably not online was rather evil. I would have accepted it only to respect the word of my rules, when I forgot to give a minimum increment. But with the .5 to give me an excuse to ignore the offer, I prefer to do so... |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
