|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e5da/9e5dadc92f0a48ae199504030251242e833a68e6" alt="Reply" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 29th, 2006, 01:02 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Quote:
RonGianti said:
You know what I find annoying? When in SE4, one of my "allies" colonizes all the planets in MY systems! ARRRRGGGHHHHH. I'll never buy SE4 until they fix that buggy piece of crap. Oh yea, it IS fixed, in SEV.
|
That was my #1 beef with SEIV. It is certainly better in SEV, but since I can't claim a system other than by colonizing in it, it isn't 100% fixed.
Example - let's say I have a colony in System A, which links to System B containing no planets I can colonize, which links to System C containing a colonizable planet. Let's say the only route from A (or anyplace else in my empire) to C is through B. Clearly I'd be wanting to call B "mine". However, if AI enters B through another warp point and colonizes in it, now it's "his" and my colony in C is cut off. So, I'd still like to be able to claim B before that happens, thus precluding it.
Still, for the system ownership situation that applies 99% of the time, SEV is much better than SEIV.
Quote:
RonGianti said:
There are a couple minor, niggling little things in SEV that will probably be "updated" anyway, and don't HOLD A CANDLE to all the stuff thats been fixed, updated and just plain improved in SEV.
|
I absolutely agree with this.
On the matter of seeing planets that so many people bring up - I actually like that because it slows down the land rush.
On the related subject of "seeing from memory", it looks from settings.txt like we have the option to set things by class, but I'd like the ability to set it by mobility. In other words to see things that can't move themselves like colonies, bases, satelites, troops, etc... from memory but not things that can move like ships & fighter groups.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 29th, 2006, 06:42 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e211b/e211bd84cbdda131b84af65420d7708192efe3fc" alt="narf poit chez BOOM's Avatar" |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
If you could claim a system simply by clicking on the map, wouldn't that mean some players would click on every system they found, thus overly limiting AI's with treaties?
(Don't actually know - Too many bugs in the demo.)
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 30th, 2006, 01:06 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b46b6/b46b692863fc1fdceb24ac3a74a9cc90cf07e967" alt="Kamog's Avatar" |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Then an Ancient Race could claim the entire galaxy during their first turn! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f8ea/7f8ea5237278ab11ec0312ac6ddc010a0b211220" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 30th, 2006, 08:14 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Quote:
narf poit chez BOOM said:
If you could claim a system simply by clicking on the map, wouldn't that mean some players would click on every system they found, thus overly limiting AI's with treaties?
|
I think it would be rather expected that you would claim any system you explored and which wasn't already claimed, as would the AI. I would that the AI could be programmed to launch a war of expansion against its (perceived) weakest neighbor if it ran out of planets to colonize within its own territory.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 30th, 2006, 08:20 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Quote:
Kamog said:
Then an Ancient Race could claim the entire galaxy during their first turn!
|
I don't know - did that happen in SEIV? I mean, even though the AI wasn't constrained much by claims, there were Ancient Races and the ability to claim explored systems...
If it is an issue, the fix is easy... You could have to actually have a presence in the system at the moment of claiming - but by "presense" I mean anything including an exploration ship, not just a colony. Sure, Ancient Races would still have an advantage, but they already do - and if necessary that could be balanced by raising the cost of being an Ancient Race.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 30th, 2006, 01:23 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
You could claim every system you saw in SE4, but it didn't really mean much since it couldn't be a part of treaties. In SE5 it does mean something, so it makes sense that MM restricted territorial claims to territory you actually have a legitimate claim on.
As far as the exploration goes, people have pointed out that you should be able to see the planets, even if it's just with telescopes. That's true, if the other system is fairly close by, but think of it this way: There are a maximum of 255 star systems in a game of SE5. There are hundreds of billions of star systems in a real galaxy. So for every system that is connected with warp points, there are a billion that are not. Therefore, it stands to reason that even a "neighboring" star system connected via warp point might be so far away that you can't see the planets, only the star.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 30th, 2006, 03:35 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03414/034142a8ce2ff3c1a40800ca757c014843916f47" alt="capnq's Avatar" |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Quote:
Barnacle Bill said:
Quote:
Kamog said:
Then an Ancient Race could claim the entire galaxy during their first turn!
|
I don't know - did that happen in SEIV? I mean, even though the AI wasn't constrained much by claims, there were Ancient Races and the ability to claim explored systems...
|
You didn't have to explore a system to claim it in SE IV. (Having to explore a system first might have slowed down AI expansion, for one thing.) In multiplayer games, some people routinely claimed the entire map on their first turn, so as not to give away any information about where their colonies actually were. Other people didn't claim any systems, or rename planets, for the same reason.
And why shouldn't an Ancient race claim the whole map? They were there first, after all. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f679f/f679f484c9000747d0204af64ca8cc8f2bcc8b7a" alt=""
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
September 30th, 2006, 06:05 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Quote:
Captain Kwok said:
Although if you've noticed a lot of players who made the early posts are slowly being converted over to SE:V. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1a2f/c1a2f1c58cce18218532da984a9ba05391d1d150" alt=""
|
Or just as likely stopped posting because there's not much point hanging around a forum for a demo you didn't like.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
October 4th, 2006, 03:20 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Well,
I've played with the demo a good bit more and it has grown on me, no doubt about that.
I have some quibbles about the controls here and there. I really don't like the ship design where I have to release the component I have selected to switch between decks. The game should either drop the component when I click on something else or it should allow me to click with a component selected.
To make me traverse the screen twice to change decks is frustrating.
I offer that as an example.
I do like some of the menus, etc.
One thing I could not figure out, but that I thought was supposed to be one of the big changes for SEV was to have multiple construction queues on the same planet. I could not figure out how to do this.
I have always thought it a bit silly that one can't build a spaceship, a weapons platform, a facility, etc. concurrenty.
It would be like saying that the U.S. has to shut down all other manufacturing while we build a space shuttle.
There should be 4 queues on each planet.
Troops
Ships
Facilities
Units (or what ever it is called)
But over all the look and feel is growing on me.
I figured I should give a report since I started this conversation off.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
October 4th, 2006, 03:32 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Growing concern - but optimistic
Just put multiple items on the construction queue and unused points will automatically bleed over to the next item.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|