|
|
|
|
|
July 18th, 2009, 01:31 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 883
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
And I was suggesting the placement swap purely by being afraid that team noob would put some Van killers to obvious sailing start. Never occurred to me Ermor had its achilles heel nations too.
Oh well, hindsight.
|
July 18th, 2009, 02:43 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDemon
Quote:
Originally Posted by melnorjr
Quote:
Originally Posted by namad
jotunheim and arco are actually the worst nations on your entire team for facing ermor. It is undebatable arco is the worst and jotunheim is at least not good even if it's not strictly the worst....
|
Really? There seem some obvious counters. too obvious maybe?
|
I think namad exaggerates a bit, but his general point is correct. Elephants are terrible against high-def, high-morale undead, and can't reliably trample ethereal units, and Ermor's typical research path takes him straight to some of the good elephant counters. Jotun's giants have poor attack and are vulnerable to swarming, and have no magic weapons. Neither nation has H3 priests or magic weapons of any sort.
I of course can't say how it would have turned out, but the matchup is nowhere near as difficult as the one up north.
|
I suppose I must admit that. I would have thought, however, that the death magic of jotun would have been of good use, and I had a few plans on how to fight ermor if I was near him that I'm not going to say anything about while I'm still in a game with you guys.
|
July 18th, 2009, 03:44 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 540
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
jotunheim has weak and expensive priests.
dust to dust isn't quite the same as banishment...
facts are just facts. no nation is absolutely worthless against another nation so being the worst at something isn't meant cruelly or insultingly.
|
July 18th, 2009, 04:26 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Romford, England
Posts: 445
Thanks: 95
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
As Jotunheim I was more worried about Vanheim than Ermor with their high defence / high damage units - all of them - not just the sacreds. Giants don't care about the opponents Protection so much. Though I agree they would not be that good against Ermor either.
In hindsight Jotunheim were not a good choice for being one of the point nations. While Giants can expand fast enough against indies (especially indie 4s!) their strength is more in their recruitable anywhere Skrattis, blood magic etc. rather than their recruitable troops and they take some time to get going.
|
July 18th, 2009, 10:28 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
OK, probably final time for this, but:
Get your Freaking turns in!
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
July 18th, 2009, 11:19 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 481
Thanks: 42
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Skinu (Caelum) left this on the Noob forum yesterday:
"if there is any way to get a 24 hour delay on the end of the deadline I can take my turn (I'm going to a friends who will let me borrow his net), if there isn't, I'm out of luck (and the game) untill Monday when they fix my internets."
Less than three hours to hosting.
|
July 18th, 2009, 11:32 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Okay I've postponed the turn. I'd forgotten he said that and was pretty sure that he'd gotten a sub for the turn. Sorry lingchih, looks like you'll have to wait a little longer.
|
July 19th, 2009, 03:09 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 883
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Wow, a truely lucky hit by whoever's casting those Fires from Afar (Abysia?). Killed only one unit and it was the leader causing a cascade failure elsewhere.
Lady Luck giveth, Lady Luck taketh.
|
July 19th, 2009, 03:22 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Quote:
Originally Posted by atul
Wow, a truely lucky hit by whoever's casting those Fires from Afar (Abysia?). Killed only one unit and it was the leader causing a cascade failure elsewhere.
Lady Luck giveth, Lady Luck taketh.
|
Province 10? That would have been me.
And its about time I had *some* luck in this game...
(Don't even talk to me abot getting attacked by independents... 5x, all in stupidly large numbers. I've seen independent attack events I didnt even know existed!)
|
July 19th, 2009, 04:21 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
A scout raid? On my cap? At this point in the game?
Ermor spits in your face C'tis.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|