|
|
|
|
|
June 20th, 2009, 02:34 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway.
Yeah, I think dispense with the NAP.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
June 20th, 2009, 03:28 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 223
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
Yeah, sorry about those starts I didn't check them for prov connections. 4 land neighbors is enough, 3 is too few, land<->water connections don't generate resources.
Let me check our forums and I think we have a list ready to go.
|
June 20th, 2009, 08:32 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
I'd very much like to have our exact capitals secret? Would it be possible for us to just pick our capitals wherever we want in that center band of 3 provinces? I realize this will take an extra day-at-least, but it prevents some early nastiness that can be done if you know someone's capital.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
June 20th, 2009, 09:32 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Romford, England
Posts: 445
Thanks: 95
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
I have no problem with Dr Praetorious's suggestion. But can't we just get a neutral to set the capitals? And therefore move them a little if this is important?
There were plenty of people who were interested in the game but for whatever reason did not decide to play. Maybe someone who played in a previous game could be asked to do this?
Or, while agreeing to have no actual NAP, perhaps we could have a prohibition on anyone moving forces (Pretenders, armies etc.) or casting spells on to the capital of an enemy nation for say the first 5 turns? Or would this crap the Vets style too much
|
June 20th, 2009, 11:13 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leptis Magna
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 23
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
While I respect Dr. Praetorious suggestions, I'm inclined toward some sort of NAP as Hoplo mentioned to prevent any sort of early nastiness. We've slaved over setting up these start locations for fairness and directness, I frankly don't want anyone tampering with em, moving anything around, or any such thing.
Ideally we noobs would like a no vet first attack NAP, prohibiting them from any sort of first attack. That would calm jittery noob nerves. Let us expand with molestation, and when we are ready strike the first blow. But Somehow I don't think the Vets would care for this.
Failing that, Hoplo's idea of a hand's off capitals for x number of turns is fine with me. Frankly, though I don't think we noobs will be risking too much. But a hand's off captitals should sooth any anxious nerves!
Last edited by Septimius Severus; June 20th, 2009 at 11:33 AM..
|
June 20th, 2009, 12:05 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 149
Thanks: 49
Thanked 15 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
I think we need to address this issue... to be honest, when I saw Cleveland's initial starting suggestion with several opposing capitals I immediatly began testing first/second turn SC flying pretenders against capitols of nations the vets would most likely choose. Vicious, yes... but I assumed the vets would use the same strategy.
|
June 20th, 2009, 12:11 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
I'm going to go on record as stating I think the rest of the settings should be kept as normal as possible to keep this like a regular mp game. It is better to have learned and lost than never to have learned at all. Or something like that.
|
June 20th, 2009, 12:13 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leptis Magna
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 23
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
Intelligent debate, I thank everyone for it.
Now my friends it is time for nation assignment, the moment has come.
Here are the ranked team lists in the interests of full disclosure (minus Ashdod and Shinuyama):
Noobs
1) Pythium
2) Abyssia
3) Vanheim
4) Jotunheim
5) Bandar Log
6) Pangaea
7) Ermor
8) Ulm
9) Arcoscephale
10) Marignon
11) Mictlan
12) Eriu
13) Agartha
14) C'tis
15) Caelum
16) Machaka
17) Man
Vets
1. Vanheim
2. Ermor
3. Pythium
4. Eriu
5. Mictlan
6. Jotunheim
7. Marignon
8. Pan
9. Abysia
10. Caelum
Here are the results:
Noobs: Pythium, Abyssia, Jottunheim, Bandar Log, Pangaea, Ulm, Arcoscephale, Agartha, C'tis, Caelum, Machaka, (+ Shinuyama)
Vets: Vanheim, Ermor, Eriu, Mictlan, Marignon, (+ Ashod)
Either team may swap nations with the opposing team or request one of the unused nations (Tien'Chi or Man). First come first serve on those two. But lets keep the squabbling if any down to a minimum.
Next two things I need done.
1. I need each team to decide which player is playing which nation (I need this info to update the opening post).
2. Next I need each team to decide which of their nations goes in their alloted starting positions (I'll post the starts, if demon doesnt, tonight).
We are then ready to begin pretender uploads. I will create the game on Llama very soon.
Thanks.
|
June 20th, 2009, 12:23 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
What? Baalz didn't take T'ien Ch'i? I thought that was a shoo in after he wrote the guide. The other vets vote him down?
I have to say I'm surprised the vets took both van and eriu. I knew one was coming, but both? Slight redundancy there. But great for raiding I admit.
My picks for what you guys would want to pick for this game: pythium, either one of caelum/van/eriu, abysia, tien chi (baalz), pangaea (figured lingchih would want to return to them for the last game), and ermor or jotunheim.
Last edited by rdonj; June 20th, 2009 at 12:38 PM..
|
June 20th, 2009, 01:45 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 540
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM, Nation Selection Underway
given the way the list system works if you want to get one and only one nation out of a sublist of two nations well.... you are **** out of luck...
we were 80% sure you would pick vanheim #1 and were treating that pick as almost a dead pick we had no chance at
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|