|
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2010, 03:53 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfb
Where, "Care bears"? What's a "care bear"?
|
Someone who whines about getting stabbed.
More generally, someone who fails to grasp that there are no rules to diplomacy, diplomacy is merely a vehicle for manipulating the actions of other players. Care Bears want everyone to always keep their word, and for people to play nicely. Needless to say, Diplomacy is a boring game when played that way.
Which isn't to say everyone will always lie, it means rational players will lie when it suits their purposes and outweighs the penalty for lying.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Squirrelloid For This Useful Post:
|
|
February 1st, 2010, 07:15 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: country of stinky fromages
Posts: 564
Thanks: 29
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Dominions 3 isn't the kind of game were I would expect to find binding diplomacy in every game, you're a god here to ban all others, so you can only expect temporary diplo solutions, as there are no such thing as allied victory.So even in a diplo binding game, you'll have to fight your 'allies' in the end.
Reasons that can lead to diplo violations in a dom game :
'Your women are all sorceresses : they wield long hairs !'
'Your hat is red, red is the color of evil !'
'How You Dare Eat Salad On A Friday, You Heretic !'
'Your God has got too many hands/tentacles/claws to be trustworthy !'
__________________
10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
Senior member of the GLIN !
|
February 1st, 2010, 07:33 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Not all games are actually about the dom3 universe where pretender gods vie for absolute dominion though. Some are just games. The objective doesn't have to be 'there can be only one' or there wouldn't be team games etc
|
February 1st, 2010, 09:46 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Carebears? Since people are starting to treat people like this is an MMORPG forum, might as well start using the terminology too. So goes another good game community! IRC is totally to blame IMO.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
February 1st, 2010, 11:07 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 812
Thanks: 106
Thanked 57 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Foodstamp, "carebear" is an old phrase from the PBM Diplomacy community (Diplomacy is a board game first published in 1959, and there weren't that many MMO's around then). As Squirrel above already defined, it means a person who freaks out when somebody backstabbs them. Actually, the word "carebear" is a derviate from the phrase "carebear allies", ie two (or more) people who stuck together from game to game, co-operating and looking after each others backsides (effectively playing as a team against the other players) then voted for a draw when just they two were left; it affected the Diplomacy ladder heavily in the 80's (and even in the 90's even though different rule-sets had been defined to prevent care-bears from ruling the ladder).
I don't know if the MMO carebear is a derivate from the Diplomacy carebear (in MMO's carebears are AFAIU people who do not like PvP encounters, but I might be wrong), but at least for me carebears in Dom are the carebears of Diplomacy and not the MMO carebears
__________________
There are three kinds of people: Those who can count and those who can not.
|
February 1st, 2010, 12:20 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
They sound pretty similar!
BTW been playing Diplomacy since the mid 80s and I had never heard the term used.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
February 1st, 2010, 02:09 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
The definition of what a care bear is differs highly from game to game. For example, in an mmo it could mean anything from a person who doesn't want pvp in a game at all, to a person who doesn't like pvp where any player can kill you at any time and take everything your character owns.
Under jarkko's definition I can't say as I've ever run into a dominions care bear.
__________________
"Easy-slay(TM) is a whole new way of marketing violence. It cuts down on all the red tape and just butchers people. As a long-time savagery enthusiast myself, I'm very excited about the synergies that the easy-slay(TM) approach brings to the entire enterprise." -Dr DrP
|
February 1st, 2010, 02:41 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 812
Thanks: 106
Thanked 57 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdonj
Under jarkko's definition I can't say as I've ever run into a dominions care bear.
|
You've never encountered Dominions players who think diplomatic agreements are binding and they never back-stab others who think so, and freak out if somebody is more machiavellian?
__________________
There are three kinds of people: Those who can count and those who can not.
|
February 1st, 2010, 02:50 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 566
Thanks: 8
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
I think he meant, he has never seen players who usually cooporate during a game, and then declare things a draw at the end.
|
February 1st, 2010, 02:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy ethics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir_Dr_D
I think he meant, he has never seen players who usually cooporate during a game, and then declare things a draw at the end.
|
Yeah, I meant the carebear allies thing. I've seen plenty of people freak out over being backstabbed.
__________________
"Easy-slay(TM) is a whole new way of marketing violence. It cuts down on all the red tape and just butchers people. As a long-time savagery enthusiast myself, I'm very excited about the synergies that the easy-slay(TM) approach brings to the entire enterprise." -Dr DrP
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|