|
|
|
|
|
May 28th, 2007, 09:23 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Nice map there vfb.
Foodstamp, we're not playing American Football.
|
May 28th, 2007, 09:45 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Quote:
Foodstamp said:
This is the pattern I normally use when placing my units.
|
That looks like a Hook and Go pattern. How exactly do I script that?
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
May 28th, 2007, 09:55 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Quote:
lch said:
Nice map there vfb.
|
Thanks, but I'm not sure it's 100% accurate. PvK thinks the zones are incorrect. I created one army with 4 commanders in the corners to determine the standard starting area, and then a 4000 unit army to see what happened in that case. From there I just counted the grids on the battle map.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
May 29th, 2007, 02:54 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
The grid is more like 58 wide by 28 deep. If the default placement spots are both filled to 4x4, then there are 26 squares between them. I think if you place a commander on the back edge, he starts out in the very rearmost square, or close to it.
|
May 29th, 2007, 04:10 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
I've got 26 squares in the neutral zone, that's the yellow/black striped area.
I've got the 'startable' areas as 28 by 28, growing to 38 by 54. Should the max be 38 by 58 instead?
I know what you're talking about in respect to starting at the back edge. It seems commanders there don't have to run 10 full squares as I have it, when they retreat. But I have seen enemy flyers surround a commander on the back edge. I'll have to test it again.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
May 29th, 2007, 01:44 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
And of course it's possible to move off the edge of the grid, e.g. when being trampled, and then the tramplers pursue off the grid too.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
November 20th, 2007, 08:48 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 26
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
If having two bodyguards is effective, why not ten? Ten of your cheapest brand of troop, since the idea is to soak up ranged attacks, not to fight. Most mages, I daresay, cost more than ten chaff troops.
-- Mal
__________________
Of two choices, I always take the third.
|
November 20th, 2007, 09:55 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
The idea is to fill up the square of the commander being guarded. Two bodyguards will do that just as well as ten.
|
November 20th, 2007, 10:55 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
Quote:
vfb said:
I think the grid is this size, please correct me if this is wrong.
((IMAGE))
|
The battlefield grid actually grows depending on the size of the attacking and defending army.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
November 21st, 2007, 02:32 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 724
Thanks: 93
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: The Art of Placement
One thing I have noticed and haven't seen mentioned is that single unit spells (paralyze, soul slay, eg)seem to preferentially target by size, ie, the size 5 and 6 creatures are targeted first, regardless of placement on the battlefield. They don't seem to pick out commanders per se, just the largest units on the field.
Because of repeated losses I stopped using SC pretenders against anything but indies. I also try to change spell scripts from single unit spells to AOE spells if scouting reports do not indicate large commanders or troops. No pleasure like soul slaying a slinger (say that fast 3 times).
__________________
Men do not quit playing because they grow old; they grow old because they quit playing.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|