|
|
|
|
 |
|
August 16th, 2006, 01:26 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
What long-term gains can be had if you are dead?  |
August 16th, 2006, 03:30 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
Plenty, in my opinion. But I'm not an athiest.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
August 17th, 2006, 09:48 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
And that could be a good thing! Think about it. The only way an athiest could exisit (as themself) is if there is a God. If there were no God, you wouldn't have athiest's!!! WOW, is he good or what?  |
August 17th, 2006, 12:42 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
I'm assuming that was meant as a joke from the , cause the illogic makes my head hurt. |
August 17th, 2006, 11:49 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 482
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
Of course, it's a circular argument. There's no way to prove or disprove the existence of God. That's why religion is based on faith.
__________________
The great tragedy of science...the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact. (T. H. Huxley)
|
August 18th, 2006, 12:19 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
Technically, there is no way to 'prove' anything.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
August 18th, 2006, 02:47 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
Tell that to mathematicians!
|
August 18th, 2006, 03:01 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
Prove mathematics!
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
August 18th, 2006, 03:30 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Emeryville, CA
Posts: 1,412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
Quote:
narf poit chez BOOM said:
Prove mathematics!
|
Philosophers and mathematicians tried. And they did the best that they could with Kurt G�del, when he proved around 1920 that it is an impossibility to have a system of mathematics that covers all mathematical truths while remaining consistent (non-contradictory).
And it is quite easy to prove things, as long as all parties involved accept the axioms of logic and all the premises used in the proof. The hard part is most people have no understanding of the axioms of logic (hence logical fallacies abound) and there is little agreement to be found regarding several premises.
__________________
GEEK CODE V.3.12: GCS/E d-- s: a-- C++ US+ P+ L++ E--- W+++ N+ !o? K- w-- !O M++ V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5++ X R !tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G+ e+++ h !r*-- y?
SE4 CODE: A-- Se+++* GdY $?/++ Fr! C++* Css Sf Ai Au- M+ MpN S Ss- RV Pw- Fq-- Nd Rp+ G- Mm++ Bb@ Tcp- L+
|
August 18th, 2006, 09:34 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT : A psychosocial question
This is the kinda stuff that Philosophers and mathematicians are good at!
If you bought:
1. $1000.00 of Nortel stock one year ago, it would now be worth $49.00.
2. Enron, you would have had $16.50 left of the original $1000.00.
3. WorldCom, you would have had less than $5.00 left.
4. But, if you had purchased $1,000.00 worth of beer one year ago, drank all the beer, then turned in the cans for the aluminum recycling REFUND, you would have earned $214.00.
Based on the above, the best current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle.
See, and you thought all that math was junk?  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
