|
|
|
|
|
June 27th, 2004, 07:34 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
I don't know about that but what I would like to know is if the first transport you put in the fleet is the first transport to drop troops. I had 2 transports, one full and one half full. the half full transport dropped first and the small amount of troops lost. If I placed the full transport first, would it drop a full load which might Last long enough to be reinforced by the second wave?
|
June 27th, 2004, 12:20 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
|
June 27th, 2004, 03:15 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
thing is, that was what i did. I even tried the reverse. shield troops first in, Last in, it didn't seem to matter. I only lost units with weapons. Even when the shield troops were the first displayed in the ground combat screen, the second box (weapons dudes) numbers dropped only.
bah but not that it matters, one or two lost per planet is a small sacrifice for a brand new load of facilities and everything. and in one turn the new planet could build them back and more!
__________________
One turn at a time
|
June 27th, 2004, 05:55 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
Try placing a single weapon on the shield troops. There might be something that makes unarmed troops always hit Last.
|
June 28th, 2004, 03:50 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
There is no such thing as Overkill
(Only "Open fire" and "I need to reload")
- 7 Habits of Highly Effective Pirates, rule #37
-----
As to the troops, try that combat again without the shield-troops.
See if you lose MORE than just the one or two gun-troops.
If so, your shieldies are blocking some damage for you, and are worthwhile.
[ June 28, 2004, 02:52: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ]
__________________
Things you want:
|
June 28th, 2004, 05:06 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
I knew you would SJ
|
June 28th, 2004, 06:27 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
I might be mistaken, but:
1) If your enemy has weapons with a range greater than 1, the AI will do the intelligent thing and attack your vulnerable troops with weapons rather than your harmless shielded troops; and
2) If you don't have many troops, then the "front lines" might contain some weaponed troops, which the AI will kill first, and then continue killing as the weaponed reserves patch the hole.
Regarding shields protecting a planet from ground assault:
I don't know why, but planet shields NEVER work that way in sci fi movies. It's always:
"Rats! Their shields are up. Now we can't bLast them into oblivion with our 1000-dreadnought fleet. Prepare for ground assault!"
It is never explained why the troop ships can get past the planet shield to drop their cargo, but the dreadnoughts can't go past and fire from just inside. I think it has something to do with Newton's Law of Good Theatre.
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
|
June 28th, 2004, 06:36 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
Well, attack ships are moving a heck of a lot slower than any KE projectile, and unlike beam weapons they're matter. The shield might just not have the capability to stop both at the same time.
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
June 28th, 2004, 09:50 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
Quote:
Originally posted by dmm:
I might be mistaken, but:
1) If your enemy has weapons with a range greater than 1, the AI will do the intelligent thing and attack your vulnerable troops with weapons rather than your harmless shielded troops; and
2) If you don't have many troops, then the "front lines" might contain some weaponed troops, which the AI will kill first, and then continue killing as the weaponed reserves patch the hole.
Regarding shields protecting a planet from ground assault:
I don't know why, but planet shields NEVER work that way in sci fi movies. It's always:
"Rats! Their shields are up. Now we can't bLast them into oblivion with our 1000-dreadnought fleet. Prepare for ground assault!"
It is never explained why the troop ships can get past the planet shield to drop their cargo, but the dreadnoughts can't go past and fire from just inside. I think it has something to do with Newton's Law of Good Theatre.
|
Which movie's would these be?
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
June 28th, 2004, 11:50 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conquering planets.
The Empire Strikes Back is the classic example. Even the puny little Rebel Allaince could build planetary shields that made any bombardment useless, so the Empire had to stage a ground assault.
[ June 28, 2004, 22:50: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|