|
|
|
|
|
February 26th, 2012, 02:19 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cool_hc
Hi Ryleh
Fair enough. But can I clarify, do we get to attack each other this turn? Or after 3 turns as per our original NAP3 ?
|
Yeah i m honoring the 3 turns, otherwise i wouldn't make it official
Good luck
|
February 27th, 2012, 11:37 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
Oops, I forgot to play last turn. No biggie, there's not much I can do anyway.
I have a bunch of useless troops holed up in my remaining castle. Should I just go AI to avoid holding you guys up any further? (Trying to break the siege would be pointless, they'd just get eaten)
|
February 27th, 2012, 01:48 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
I guess at this point no one will complain if you go AI.
Thanks for fighting til the end ! i hope you ve enjoyed the game
|
February 27th, 2012, 01:53 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 992
Thanks: 47
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
If you do leave can we get an AAR from you?
|
February 27th, 2012, 04:24 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
I don't have much to offer in the way of an after-action report... I basically played a pretty weak game. I had the advantage of a corner start which meant I could initially develop in peace. I saw Pythium's growing strength and decided I needed to go on the offensive. Unfortunately Agartha was in the way, so I tried to stomp on him first. I made mediocre progress against Agartha, then Pythium came in and started crushing me.
I held on to research Fire Storm and torched Pythiums army of Theurgs. I never had a response for his SCs, but he only had a few so I was able to start retaking territory and prepare to counterattack.
Then Caelum steamrolled in and that was that
OK, I've switched to AI. Have fun everyone!
|
March 1st, 2012, 08:46 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
Hi Bullock
Could I please have a 24hour extension. I'm going to need an extra day to plan all my defensive and offensive actions against you.
Thanks
|
March 1st, 2012, 11:30 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
postponed
|
March 3rd, 2012, 11:17 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
Hi Bullock, i don't mean to be nit-picky, but I thought we had 1 more round of NAP left ? hence my inaction against you this turn. As Shinuyama hasn't started any actions against me this turn, I assume he also believed there was 1 more round of NAP.
Anyways, in the long run I don't think it will make much difference, but would like to point it out nonetheless.
|
March 3rd, 2012, 11:43 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 221
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
Well done, Immaculate. You took accurate aim at Pythium's weaknesses and then surprised me with Foul Vapors. It's been fun watching your play improve as the game has progressed.
|
March 3rd, 2012, 12:34 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Colonial Conquest - MA - (Running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mockingbird
Well done, Immaculate. You took accurate aim at Pythium's weaknesses and then surprised me with Foul Vapors. It's been fun watching your play improve as the game has progressed.
|
Yeah was a nice battle. Very well played Imma.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cool_hc
Hi Bullock, i don't mean to be nit-picky, but I thought we had 1 more round of NAP left ? hence my inaction against you this turn. As Shinuyama hasn't started any actions against me this turn, I assume he also believed there was 1 more round of NAP.
Anyways, in the long run I don't think it will make much difference, but would like to point it out nonetheless.
|
i m sry if i ve made a mistake counting turn.
I took in consideration the turn i warned you though.
Immaculate what do you think ?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|