Lithuania vs USA Challenge - USA Thread - Page 21

Loser · #**201** January 8th, 2004, 03:10 PM

Offering? O_o

Well it's really worth that much to me. More of a burden I'm willing to bare, you know.

Loser · #**202** January 9th, 2004, 02:12 AM

If I have met him you can have him surrender to me. This is a U.S. player, no?

Pablo · #**203** January 9th, 2004, 07:46 AM

Loser, so you're not interested in expanding your empire? TWICE the present size?!

Unknown_Enemy · #**204** January 9th, 2004, 06:42 PM

New turn available.

Loser · #**205** January 9th, 2004, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pablo:
Loser, so you're not interested in expanding your empire? TWICE the present size?!

Oh, I'm interested. But not enough that I'm going to keep someone else from getting it if they want it. This being a team game, as long as one of us has that empire then the team is still fine.

Unknown_Enemy · #**206** January 12th, 2004, 10:39 PM

ok, jfp's empire is done.

Unknown_Enemy · #**207** January 15th, 2004, 10:26 AM

Sigh.

Killmaster bailed out.
What shall I do with his empire ?

Loser · #**208** January 15th, 2004, 01:11 PM

is that another U.S.A. player?

Dangit!

Al right, what does that leave? One? Two Players on the U.S.A. side?

grumble, grumble, grumble

What is it about this game that is so troublesome?

Loser · #**209** January 15th, 2004, 03:50 PM

I've tried pulling friends into this game. I have a spare copy of Gold that I lend them until they get tired of it (I'd let them keep it if any of them ever wanted to, ever got stuck on the game). But everyone I know loses interest in it reletivly swiftly. It is a niche game.

Seriously, how far down is the U.S.A. side? I'm not taking you six on alone without a new rule banning Intel.

Unknown_Enemy · #**210** January 15th, 2004, 04:17 PM

ATM, the US team is made of looser, Gandalf and Woundwort vs the 6 of the LT team.