|
|
|
|
|
December 9th, 2005, 12:36 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL.
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
Quote:
Slick said:
Repairs are indeed "free" (i.e. they cost no resources) In game terms, that's what the "Maintenance" cost is for. It doesn't seem too logical, but hey, that's how it works.
|
It�s a little known fact that the monthly maintains cost for ships included an insurance policy for full replacement of any damaged components, so repairing a damaged component doesn�t cost extra. There is an exception clause in the case where the ship is totally destroyed they don�t have to replace anything.
|
December 16th, 2005, 02:00 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA USA
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
Thanks for all the posts.
Well, it happened again and I think I know why. I did not elect collision coverage Until recently I did not know about the 1.36M resource conversion limit for each RC III. So I started keeping an eye on that to make sure I did not exceed the limit. What I did not know until now is that resource conversion orders above the 1.36M limit carry over to the next turn. I must not have noticed the lit-up view orders icon when I gave the converter new orders for more conversion. The resource conversion backlog must have been for radioactives, and I guess that I put the radioactive conversion first on my new orders last turn. I figure this because only radioactives converted this turn and not the organics I ordered. So the backlog conversion of rads added to the new order to exceed the 1.2M rads I had in storage; therefore, nothing retrofitted. AAAAHHHHH - The Bug is ME!
LESSON I LEARNED: always clear any left over conversion orders before issuing new ones! OR - keep your eye on the eyeball! Sorry for wasted time guys - I would have noticed this sooner if I read sooner about the 1.36M converting limit. Perhaps these posts are worthwhile though in case someone else also does not see the 1.36M limit noted in the FAQs but does pick it up here.
Oh - and I have often thanked God that repairs do not cost anything. That would really drive me nuts!
Have a happy holiday all and thanks for your help!!!
|
December 16th, 2005, 03:41 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
I noticed you did a similar thing with your former empire in Stellar Battles after noticing a bunch of retrofits not going through.
|
December 16th, 2005, 04:16 PM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
I believe the Resource Conversion limit is per converter so you can convert more resources by making facilities on other planets.
__________________
Slick.
|
December 16th, 2005, 05:25 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA USA
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
Quote:
Captain Kwok said:
I noticed you did a similar thing with your former empire in Stellar Battles after noticing a bunch of retrofits not going through.
|
Yes, in every game that I had that many resources to convert I made this mistake. I just assumed it was a bug, but started to wonder when I didn't hear of it happening to anyone else. I don't know why I didn't notice before that there were conversion orders still pending when it happened and they related to resources that had not been converted. But anyway, I now know I no longer must deal with this affliction! [Cap'n Al rolls on floor imitating Gullom, shouting "I'm Free, I'm Free"]
You should be in pretty good shape in that game despite the wasted resources. I was giving some away to the Earth partner periodically - he seemed to be the most loyal ally to the Zappazoids in that game.
|
December 21st, 2005, 02:13 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA USA
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
Need a bit of help once more. I looked over the FAQ and didn't see this, but if it is there I apologize & just let me know that. Thanks.
Question is regarding firing priority: What does strongest and weakest relate to - is strongest gauged by damage points the ship can sustain or the firepower of the ship? My fleets keep hitting my opponents "decoy" ships first - you know, the ones with 25 Crystal Armor plates and 6 shields. I can't afford another big loss. I had strongest as priority, so maybe that seeks the ship with greatest damage resistance. But I tried weakest in the simulator - same thing happened. I tried it with no strongest/weakest priority, and still the ships targeted the decoy first. Hopefully someone can give me a quick answer to this one, or I might as well give up on the game (and without me the game is essentially over for everyone). Thanks again.
|
December 23rd, 2005, 01:38 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA USA
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
I think the addition of my post above is not obvious to most, since there is no answer and little views. I am going to post it as its own topic. Probably shouldn't be here anyway.
|
January 26th, 2006, 06:12 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
I think this is the right place for your post. The simulator can't be trusted but I will add something I noticed. I haven't got to the bottom of this "issue" so I will only say what I have seen so far, in the hope that others may have seen this too!. I have tried different firering priorities and sometimes there seems to be no change even though I have done similar to you,... (changed from strongest to weakest etc) On many occasions I have given up and gone to resume my game. Thats when I noticed that the spaceyard build rates had changed, eg,.. a ship that normally takes 2 turns to build would now be taking 3 turns to build??. Also the amount of resources I had stored had reduced! ... and all I had done was use the simular!??. So I saved and quit. I then re-opened my game and everything was back in order. I then checked the same simulation and this time I did see a difference. So I only do a few simulations at a time and I always re-open to resume my game. Seems to work better?????? I think ! lol
Out of fustration I just made my firering priority Nearest, Nearest, Nearest, Nearest!
|
January 26th, 2006, 06:26 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
Oh yeah,... was going to ask if anyone could recommend a good map for up to ten players. The game I am playing has a custom map. I would like to find something big??? Just interested in some feedback really. What your fav map?
|
January 26th, 2006, 06:52 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Massive Planetary Shield Generators
That sort of question should probably be posted in a new thread. Stickied threads should strive to remain on-topic, else they are not as useful as stickied threads.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|