.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 15th, 2002, 09:54 PM
minipol's Avatar

minipol minipol is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 558
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
minipol is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

it think they shoul add it as an option. so Users can choose how they perceive the workings of spaceyards. nearly everything else is modable, why not this?
__________________
A Se++ GdY $++ Fr+ C++++ Csc Sf++ Ai** AuO M MpT MpSk MpFd S--- Ss- RV Pw Fq Nd- Rp- G Mm++ Bb++ Tcp+ L++
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 15th, 2002, 10:17 PM
Ragnarok's Avatar

Ragnarok Ragnarok is offline
General
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ragnarok is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

Quote:
Originally posted by henk brouwer:
I personally liked the way spaceyards worked in SEIII. (I hope I remember this correctly) you could buy as many ships as you wanted in one location in a turn, but they had to be repaired by your spaceyards. They would start out as empty hulls with 100% damage, repairing them could take a lot of time. When your spaceyard was attacked you could try and defend it with your half-finished ships, in the SEIV system you'll have to wait until your ship is completed before you can use it..
Yes, I liked this system as well. Although I never had SEIII, I downloaded it but didn't play it much, since I downloaded demo to SEIV at same time. But it was the same system as SEII had. But a ship and next turn you had a hull with 100% damage. Then it slowly repaired itself depending on how many ship yard componants you had at the planets. I'd like to see this sytem again in SEV.
__________________
Ragnarok - Hevordian Story Thread
-------------------
I think...therefore I am confused.
They were armed. With guns, said Omari.
Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?
The dreaded derelict dwelling two ton devil bunny!
Every ship can be a minesweeper... Once
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 15th, 2002, 11:01 PM
geoschmo's Avatar

geoschmo geoschmo is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
geoschmo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

I considered at one point doing a mod to bring this SEIII kind of Space Yard queue back in. Pretty much all you need is to remove the +50% retrofit restrictions. You can do this in the settings.txt file by greatly increasing it. Not sure the highest it will take, maybe 999%. That should do it. Then you have your base hull with just the bridge/lifesupport/crew quarters, and then on the next turn you retrofit it to whatever design you want. It would take two steps instead of one, but it wouldn't be all that bad.

Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 15th, 2002, 11:06 PM

Lemmy Lemmy is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lemmy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
I considered at one point doing a mod to bring this SEIII kind of Space Yard queue back in. Pretty much all you need is to remove the +50% retrofit restrictions. You can do this in the settings.txt file by greatly increasing it. Not sure the highest it will take, maybe 999%. That should do it. Then you have your base hull with just the bridge/lifesupport/crew quarters, and then on the next turn you retrofit it to whatever design you want. It would take two steps instead of one, but it wouldn't be all that bad.

Geoschmo
that wouldn't be completely fair, cos the expensive stellar components would be build in two turns then, instead of 10.
__________________
[Boo!]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 15th, 2002, 11:40 PM
Fyron's Avatar

Fyron Fyron is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Fyron is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

that wouldn't be completely fair, cos the expensive stellar components would be build in two turns then, instead of 10.

IF you had 50K-80K of each resource available at once, then yes. Or, make it so that you can't retrofit to them, by setting the max retrofit setting so that it is under their build cost.
__________________
It's not whether you win or lose that counts: it's how much pain you inflict along the way.
--- SpaceEmpires.net --- RSS --- SEnet ModWorks --- SEIV Modding 101 Tutorial
--- Join us in the #SpaceEmpires IRC channel on the Freenode IRC network.
--- Due to restrictively low sig limits, you must visit this link to view the rest of my signature.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old July 16th, 2002, 01:53 AM
geoschmo's Avatar

geoschmo geoschmo is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
geoschmo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

Quote:
Originally posted by Lemmy:
That wouldn't be completely fair, cos the expensive stellar components would be build in two turns then, instead of 10.
Well, that may be, but that's how the SEIII construction queue worked. the goal wouldn't be to make it fair, but to make it like SEIII. Besides, how could it be unfair if it was the same for everyone. I guess it would be unfair to the AI, cause they couldn't possible be made to take advantage of it, but everyone knows my take on that already.

Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 16th, 2002, 08:55 PM
Pax's Avatar

Pax Pax is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 442
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pax is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

(bump)
__________________
-- Sean
-- GMPax

Download the Small Ships mod, v0.1b Beta 2.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 17th, 2002, 05:22 AM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

Quote:
Originally posted by henk brouwer:
I personally liked the way spaceyards worked in SEIII. (I hope I remember this correctly) you could buy as many ships as you wanted in one location in a turn, but they had to be repaired by your spaceyards. They would start out as empty hulls with 100% damage, repairing them could take a lot of time. When your spaceyard was attacked you could try and defend it with your half-finished ships, in the SEIV system you'll have to wait until your ship is completed before you can use it..
Yes, I thought this was much more realistic. You could attack a ship-building center and destroy ships before they were completed. Now they just magically 'pop into existence' when they are paid for. Weird...

But at least they don't vanish when they are mothballed. You can destroy mothballed ships very easily. Hmm, I wonder if ECM is active on a mothballed ship?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 17th, 2002, 05:46 AM
Krsqk's Avatar

Krsqk Krsqk is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Krsqk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

SEIII's system worked because both repairs and damage were measured in components. SEIV's current system is a bit in-between; we repair per component, but build and destroy by kt. If the build system was changed to repair purchased ships instead of building, you'd have the problems with instant stellar manip comps.

If you changed the repair to kt, and then repaired ships you had purchased, the system would work more appropriately. Emergency build would speed up repair times, which would then drop to lower repair rates. It might even be better not to pay up front, but to pay for components on the turn on which they're completed.

Being able to destroy ships-in-progress also added some suspense to attacking planets--are those 35 dreadnaughts functional, or empty shells?

[ July 17, 2002, 04:49: Message edited by: Krsqk ]
__________________
The Unpronounceable Krsqk

"Well, sir, at the moment my left processor doesn't know what my right is doing." - Freefall
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 17th, 2002, 10:00 PM
Skulky's Avatar

Skulky Skulky is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
Posts: 521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Skulky is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Feature request: Build queue change for SE5

I think we should leave it the same as before, however with the addition of multiple queues on one ship, like a starbase with 5 SYs... IIRC SEIII had that where you had many yards available to build from even if you only had one base. Reworking the whole architecture is too hard and IMHO not worth it, it works good now and makes sense.

[ July 17, 2002, 21:01: Message edited by: Skulky ]
__________________
Come join the forces of democracy and fight for independence from Totalitarianism, Dictatorships, Emperors and Empresses, Oligarchys and Fundamentalists at SE4 by Committee
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.