|
|
|
|
|
April 19th, 2011, 01:34 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Moscow
Posts: 64
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
Hmmm... Maybe, I`m wrong, but looks like AI`s desire to follow your orders based on unit`s experience. Heroes and squads with 2+ stars are more likely to do what I want: outflank, attack rear or else
May somebody check it?
__________________
Plz sorry for my english - I`m Russian, and have no time to practice. If you want to discuss the game - well, let`s do it. If you want to discuss mistakes - write pm
Also grammar nazis must say sorry to my sick duck, yeah
|
April 19th, 2011, 03:44 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
isn't it based on morale? So the stars help there.
|
April 24th, 2011, 02:01 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
Enemy commanders can only be targetted by Attack Large Enemy Monsters and presumably Attack Cavalry and Attack Flyers - assuming no non-commanders of these types are present.
When determining 'rearmost' your unit ignores all commanders and only considers units of troops. (I don't know that flyers can actually get distracted, although flankers certainly can).
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Squirrelloid For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 24th, 2011, 02:43 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 732
Thanks: 65
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
my god another epiphany
|
April 24th, 2011, 03:40 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 138
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
I recently assigned "Attack Large Enemy Monsters" for my flying SC (50morale & 3stars) to kill Pangaea's Pans who had the most life in the enemy army, but he never went after them.
|
April 24th, 2011, 04:20 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,735
Thanks: 272
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
Well, it is probably just a check to see if you ignore orders, and not a morale check. Or else undead would always follow orders.
|
April 25th, 2011, 01:43 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
Ain't "large monster" size 4 and more ?
I think pans are only size 3.
__________________
Often I must speak other than I think. That is called diplomacy.
* Stilgar
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you a cover up. Real boats rock.
* Darwi Odrade
|
April 25th, 2011, 04:43 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,735
Thanks: 272
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
I think target large monster just picks the highest size + hp on the battle and attacks that.
|
April 26th, 2011, 04:22 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
Kasnavada probably has a point, size 3 isn't really a large enemy monster, and while it will *tend* to focus on them if larger monsters aren't present, it doesn't specifically target them. At least that's my impression.
|
April 26th, 2011, 08:14 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Flight + attack rear
I thought I've seen it somewhere, soooo... I checked the manual. What it says : Large monster are size 5 and 6, and "will take size 4 if none present". Probably won't take size 3 then.
__________________
Often I must speak other than I think. That is called diplomacy.
* Stilgar
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you a cover up. Real boats rock.
* Darwi Odrade
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|