|
|
|
|
|
February 12th, 2010, 05:14 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: a new direction to guides
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejeff
What do you do with your fire magic against 100% FR?
|
Prison of Fire + {blood rain, wind of death, or huge fear Scs....}. Especially under CBM.
|
February 12th, 2010, 04:01 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 434
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: a new direction to guides
Well, you take indies and maybe even enemy provinces with a handfull of heavy infantry, of course.
Plus, you have to keep him around in case there is a non-FR SC.
I tend to think of that particular unit as a defensive unit to use especially with PD against armies. He also has enough HP to be useful with some armor for casting close range spells as well.
But, against a FR opponent, he can only smite.
If you need a temple destroyed or something, especially if you have a financial advantage, it may be well worth it to use this unit to take a providence, even if it endagers his long term survival.
Most stuff is not immune to Falling Fires.
Maybe I'm just confused, because I thought using a mage like this was standard fare. If he can destroy 2 temples of something before dying, he's probably done well for himself. I don't think that qualifies him as a thug, cause he performs better against small armies with a little protection of his own... in some ways, a minimal investment.
Last edited by BigDaddy; February 12th, 2010 at 04:18 PM..
|
February 12th, 2010, 04:27 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 887
Thanks: 144
Thanked 40 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: a new direction to guides
Read the DARs in the AAR section. Step by step inside the brains of Cleveland and Trumanator as a game plays out. They are clever chaps but after so much time in their heads you'll want to take a shower after...
ssj
__________________
"I think, therefore I am" - René Descartes
"I yam what I yam" - Popeye
|
February 12th, 2010, 05:26 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tacoma WA, USA
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 103
Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: a new direction to guides
Blindness
|
February 12th, 2010, 07:28 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 434
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: a new direction to guides
Ah, an Anathemant Dragon is better than nothing. Sounds like with some PD, some gems, and some penetration items, he might be able to cripple or kill the SC (cause it to be killed).
|
February 12th, 2010, 09:16 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: a new direction to guides
Better than nothing, certainly.
Don't knock Flames from the Sky either. It's much easier to wipe out large armies outside of battle sometimes.
I'm not saying Fire is useless. It's just one of the more limited paths.
It's got great expansion and early war potential, but rapidly becomes less effective than most of the other paths.
Which is why Abysia usually goes off into Blood & Astral.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|