.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT > TO&Es
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 22nd, 2010, 12:45 PM

thatguy96 thatguy96 is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
thatguy96 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Early U.S. Army armed helos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir View Post
Not sure I'd call it "luxury".
The USMC efforts at developing armed helicopters were hampered mostly by equipment (early helos had a pretty poor lift capacity and range) and budget.
From what I've gathered one of the main hindrances to the US Armys efforts was the US Air Force
That's why I said relative heh. The USMC more or less had the same type of helicopters available to them as the Army did. The Army pressed ahead because of constant Air Force resistance to its attempts to develop a fixed wing close air support capability.

The draft TOEs for the 11th Air Assault Division in the early 1960s called for a very large number of armed OV-1 Mohawks to support operations. The deployment of the 23rd Special Warfare Aviation Company to Vietnam in the early 1960s was supposed to test this capability. In the end, all it did was cause the Air Force to create such a ruckus that the Army eventually had to cede one fixed wing component of its planned Air Assault/Airmobile Division (the CV-2) and reduce the roles of the other (OV-1).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.