|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
December 9th, 2008, 09:53 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: advanced era
I've just looked up the weapon for the RPG-30. According to ARMS-TASS it is designated the PG-30. Is it the same as the RPG-27 or is it somehow different? The PG-30 and RPG-27 are both 105mm with a tandem warhead.
P.S. When I wrote 'warhead' in my earlier posts I sometimes meant 'weapon.' Sloppy English on my part. I would go back and edit my mistakes - but I'm too late now.
|
December 9th, 2008, 11:12 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: advanced era
I believe I saw it in one article that was posted on the topic on Tank-Net - generally RPG-27, plus that little rocket.
RUMINT has it that it was designed for a Mid-Eastern customer, that would give most likely Syria or Iran.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
December 9th, 2008, 11:31 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: advanced era
I vaguely remember reading somewhere that Venezuela has also shown an interest in the RPG-30.
The game manual says that ‘Multi charge ATGM’ have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT. I’ve assumed that ‘Multi-charge HEAT’ weapons – such as the newer RPGs – also have a higher chance of defeating ERA. Have I assumed too much? In any case, perhaps I should have used a multi charge ATGM as my example.
|
December 9th, 2008, 01:32 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,495
Thanks: 3,966
Thanked 5,704 Times in 2,815 Posts
|
|
Re: advanced era
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat2
The game manual says that ‘Multi charge ATGM’ have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT. I’ve assumed that ‘Multi-charge HEAT’ weapons – such as the newer RPGs – also have a higher chance of defeating ERA. Have I assumed too much? In any case, perhaps I should have used a multi charge ATGM as my example.
|
Yes, Multi-charge HEAT also has a higher chance of defeating ERA. That's what they are designed to defeat.
Don
|
December 9th, 2008, 02:08 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brazil/France/Somewhere over the Atlantic
Posts: 660
Thanks: 21
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: advanced era
Is DC-HEAT the same thing that multi-charge HEAt?
|
December 9th, 2008, 03:13 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: advanced era
Quote:
Originally Posted by iCaMpWiThAWP
Is DC-HEAT the same thing that multi-charge HEAt?
|
See the game documentation:
Mobhack Help->Weapons Tab->Weapons Class-> description of class 20+
(class 23 will be the same as for TA-ATGM, but an RPG version, for MBT LAW/NLAW)
Cheers
Andy
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|