|
|
|
|
|
November 3rd, 2006, 07:34 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
haha no one likes the remote search nerf =).
|
November 3rd, 2006, 07:36 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Why would anyone like it? Remote searching is the only thing that removes the horrid micromanagement of searching for magic sites.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 07:36 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Quote:
- Red Dragon is rather redutant now
|
Why?
Quote:
- The research bonus on Titaness is just crazy
|
It's not, it has to be very high to make you consider leaving such an expensive pretender to research.
Quote:
- Moving Phoenix Power and Earthpower to pathlevel 3....wthex, this completely nullifies the purpose of those spells which bootstrapping Fire 2 and Earth 2 commanders to actually useful magic levels. Now they are there just to bring some slight boost to Falling Fires and Bladewind. But wait, with Dominions 3 research times and changes in the mod it's unlikely we'll see either spell in use ever anyway. Whee.
|
I am positive I will still use both spells whenever I have e3 or f3 mages and conj 3, which is usually a high research priority anyway. Graeme does make a good point about Ulm ME, I may have to consider nerfing a bit differntly.
Quote:
- Moving Lightning Bolt to Evocation 3 makes early game with Caelum feel like trying to piss blood up the wall.
|
Expanding using mages was not really necessary to start with, try mammoth and wingless.
Quote:
- Bladewind costing a gem..........WTF. I'm sorry, but WTF. Umor, just make the spell have less effects or damage if it is too powerful but you just made earth utterly useless for combat. What are Agarthans and Ulm going to do in combat now? Or Marverni? Magma Bolts? Star Fires and Farstrike!? You have no idea how many nations you essentially invalidated with this move! Half the amount of the blades, make it do less damage or 99 fatigue instead of the 80 it was.
|
You may be right that cutting the number of effects would be less annoying to people, but I don't think this change is actually less extreme power wise than half the effects.
Quote:
- Thunder Strike at research level 5? Uhhhh...no. Just make it less powerful if you feel it is too strong. It already has a fatigue cost of 80 so it's not terribly spammable.
|
I don't see why the research nerf is worse.
Quote:
- I don't like upping pathcosts for site search spells either
|
This is a change I knew would not go down easily. I'm not absolutly committed too it, but I would like people to give it a try before deciding it sucks. I think the benefits from better magic diversity can outweigh the seemingly minor annoyance.
Quote:
- Seven Year Fever, are you sure an AOE Disease spell that scales with power is a good idea?
|
Yes, I do, it is still rather hard to use effectivly.
Quote:
- No Raise Skeletons at all?
|
Check slightly higher in research.
I consider such matters of thematicness IW's call. However, I am still looking at boosting them in other ways.
Quote:
- ME Marignon has Lion TRibe Warrior instead of Friar in recruitable commanders
|
Thanks for the catch.
I hope everyone keeps in mind, as I said in the first post, these are not final changes, they are things to try. Some changes you may find imbalancing, so try them out, and then convince me. Even better, suggest other ways to acomplish the same goal.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 07:46 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Quote:
quantum_mechani said:
Graeme does make a good point about Ulm ME, I may have to consider nerfing a bit differntly.
|
I'd suggest not nerfing it at all. Battlefield magic needs to be able to ensure that a mage can kill, at an absolute minimum, his gold cost in troops, or else you might as well not bother researching it. To be truly balanced with respect to research costs, it should enable a mage to kill many times his gold cost in troops.
Quote:
You may be right that cutting the number of effects would be less annoying to people, but I don't think this change is actually less extreme power wise than half the effects.
|
Of course it's a more extreme nerf. For one thing, it means that I would never cast the spell in any battle, ever. It's not like the spell needed it. I would have suggested halfing the fatigue cost on it and most battlefield spells to make them actually worthwhile.
Quote:
I don't see why the research nerf is worse.
|
I don't see why any nerf is necessary at all. It can kill a maximum of three troops per turn, for a spell that requires a capital only mage or massive horde of communicants for every nation that can cast it. That means that you need to cast it multiple times a battle for it to pay for itself.
Quote:
This is a change I knew would not go down easily. I'm not absolutly committed too it, but I would like people to give it a try before deciding it sucks. I think the benefits from better magic diversity can outweigh the seemingly minor annoyance.
|
It's not a seemingly minor annoyance, it's a game killer. Nor does it promote diversity. What it actually does is restrict the site searching spells to those few nations that have native level 3 path mages. Everyone else gets the joy of manually moving mages around the map.
Quote:
I hope everyone keeps in mind, as I said in the first post, these are not final changes, they are things to try.
|
Thing is, most of the changes really aren't worth trying. I can tell just by looking at the spells that I won't be casting blade wind ever, nor will I be casting the site searching spells.
Quote:
Some changes you may find imbalancing, so try them out, and then convince me. Even better, suggest other ways to acomplish the same goal.
|
I'd suggest starting from the Dom2 mod, rather than trying to further nerf magic down to useless levels.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 07:57 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
As for Red Dragon, I can sum it up with two words: Solar Disc.
As for Blade Wind costing gems, Graeme summed up well. What makes you think that having it cost earth gems you must earn and micromanage is less drastic than making it less powerful?
Research nerfs are worse because it eliminates a spell that required a 4+ Air mage to be used more than once, max twice per battle until a high level of research.
EDIT: I also pretty much echo Graeme. Why not just start with porting CB for Dom 2?
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 07:58 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Well, there's many good things, I mean things that many/most players wanted to change because over/under powered/priced , be it Hellheim nerfing or most pretender changes. Still Titaness' 25 RP bonus is so high I thought it was a typo ! .
Yet there are *many other* things that aren't "balanced", but just changed because the author wanted to change it : the remote searches at level 3 research/ path 3 totally changes the way searches could be done, but don't change the game balance at all !
Some other changes - BW nerfing and many Evo nerfs also are hard to justify as "balance changes", I didn't ever see anyone claiming BW was unbalanced...
Now for example Ulm that always was weak now looks utterly crap, with smiths unable to cast Gnome Lore without E.Boots, requiring a gem for Earthpower, and paying gems for BW !!
So they won't even have an earth gem pile to cast their FotA later in the game, poor ones...
Eventually I don't think I'll use this mod, but I still think that what we need is a simple mod rebalancing the most blatant balance issues, agreed on by at least a good part of the community, without taking this as an opportunity to make the game fit the mod author's wishes as how it should play.
QM, don't take this too harshly or as an attack on you, I recognize the effort, it's just that this mod doesn't fit my vision of a "balance mod".
|
November 3rd, 2006, 08:09 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 08:23 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Vine arrow appears to be massively bugged. It has a gigantic AOE, yet it doesn't seem to be that effetive against singular enemies... o____o
I can even provide a savegame to show this.
EDIT: Okay, I'm not sure if this anymore related to just Vine Arrow, but something is most definedly wrong in this game with Machaka...I, uh, I think I need to show it.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 10:15 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Quote:
Nerfix said:
As for Red Dragon, I can sum it up with two words: Solar Disc.
|
The solar disk is quite awful for expanding, you would need at very minimum protection buffs. Those extra provinces you pick up from expanding from turn 2 forward are very important.
Quote:
As for Blade Wind costing gems, Graeme summed up well. What makes you think that having it cost earth gems you must earn and micromanage is less drastic than making it less powerful?
|
Well, it's quite obvious why it's less drastic than cutting it's number of effects in half, that directly cuts it's effectivness in half where as this just makes it trickier to use. Given that I'd be just as happy with either nerf, I'm inclined to switch it next version.
Quote:
Research nerfs are worse because it eliminates a spell that required a 4+ Air mage to be used more than once, max twice per battle until a high level of research.
|
Thunder strike is an extremly useful spell at _any_ stage of the game. Even ff it were level 9 research I think it would probably still be used on occation.
Quote:
EDIT: I also pretty much echo Graeme. Why not just start with porting CB for Dom 2?
|
Very many things have changed since dom2. Many of the most powerful options in the game were nerfed, so the buffs to other options would be overkill.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 10:18 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 0.9
Quote:
Nerfix said:
Vine arrow appears to be massively bugged. It has a gigantic AOE, yet it doesn't seem to be that effetive against singular enemies... o____o
I can even provide a savegame to show this.
EDIT: Okay, I'm not sure if this anymore related to just Vine Arrow, but something is most definedly wrong in this game with Machaka...I, uh, I think I need to show it.
|
Your save game needs a mod called sns3. In any case, I didn't mod vine arrow.
I have of course read the conceptual balance discussion thread.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|