|
|
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2006, 06:21 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
Quote:
Nerfix said:
Three blood slaves, not such a huge difference.
|
That's in Early Era. In Late Era it's only one. But Late Mictlan rocks in so many other ways that I can work around the initial difficulties in spreading dominion.
|
October 23rd, 2006, 07:09 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
Apart from the Frogzards, doesn't LA Mictlan have any significant differences?
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
October 23rd, 2006, 07:39 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
high priest of sun B2/F2, Forgzard with W3/B2/110% random. Little frog priest (B1/W1), forgsacred unit. not much differance.
__________________
Qui tacet consentit
|
October 23rd, 2006, 07:42 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
Otherwise the troop roster is same as in MA?
For the record I like the frogzards.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
October 23rd, 2006, 07:43 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
The capital priests are much cheaper in the Late Era.
|
October 23rd, 2006, 07:47 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
Oh? That's certainly handy. I ran a test with them once but I mostly just recruited the frogzards.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
October 23rd, 2006, 08:02 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
Frogzards are... well, they're frogs! why anyone would recruit anything else is beyond me. Seriously, they're way to cool to miss. I built armies of them. As far as sacreds go, they're not too great, but they're sooooo cool.
__________________
Qui tacet consentit
|
October 23rd, 2006, 08:06 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
They're cute.
LA Atlantis is one of my favorite nations. Hordes of squat lil' frogzards that are doing their best trying to look evil with all that ice and bone. And then they stop the enemies with Harpoons and chop them down with Bone Glaives.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
October 24th, 2006, 12:45 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
The best point about LA Mictlan is that the addition of Atlantians means they are a true underwater race. They can easily expand into oceans and can build PD under the sea, etc. They can't be build underwater fortresses, but living castle takes care of that.
|
October 24th, 2006, 02:46 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Mictlan is not too bright.
Frogzards? I'm going to have to take a look at that.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|