|
|
|
|
 |
|
May 8th, 2006, 07:18 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Were the warships all minesweepers? =)
|
May 8th, 2006, 07:28 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Minesweepers posing as warships? Could be actually: Minesweeper has been known to destroy the productivity of some workers. It isn't a very deadly weapon, though.
All four vessels were equipped with weaponry and supplies, though I don't recall for sure whether they used Direct Fire weapons or Seekers. Of course, Seekers are known to have a few bugs, but Direct Fire is a good deal more likely at turn 50 (when the attack occurred).
For what it's worth, we both concluded it was a bug, and I no longer have the savegame as my harddrive crashed since then.
|
May 8th, 2006, 07:49 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Did you see the Dr Who episode they aired on Scifi channel this past friday?
Guy was claiming ambulances were warships, since they are used in wars. =)
The group I play with ran into a bug where you can have a fleet with a troop transport set to capture planet, fleet set to capture planet.... but the capturing of the planet never occurs. The planet had no population, and no defenses.... so the troop transport refused to land troops. Very odd.
|
May 8th, 2006, 09:24 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Planets with no population cause that issue.
Nobody sees it as a valid target.
__________________
Things you want:
|
May 8th, 2006, 11:45 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Thank you for all the thoughtful replies, everyone.  |
May 9th, 2006, 02:19 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: At work or sleeping
Posts: 821
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Quote:
Kamog said:
Thank you for all the thoughtful replies, everyone.
|
Yes, yes.... all the thoughtful replies completely off-topic to the question of data files. LOL. We rule!
__________________
Aa Turam Empire
Geekdom is eternal... you will be assimilated... resistance is futile.
A+ Se GdY S++ Fr- C* Cs* Sf- Ai++ Au>M! M- Mp! S@ Ss+ R! Pw+ Fq++ Nd? Rp++ G++ Mm++ Bb-- L-- Tcp
'We, the weird, chasing the pointless, for no reason at all, have been finding out things that have no effect on anything important for at least a couple days and are now qualified to chase our tails to the merriment of all watching.'-Narf et al
"Of course, you don't want to be going about handing out immortality willy-nilly, that just wouldn't be responsible." -O'Shea
|
May 15th, 2006, 03:16 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: texas
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
whoa there sj so the game i'm in where a enemy has a planet but never populated it
effectivly said planet is immune to troop transport ships
the only way is destroy and colonize
darn
__________________
Laaanndd!!!! ---lex luthor
se4 code
L+++ GDY $!+ Fr! C+++ SDS T+hot SF* TCP A&++ M++lrn Mp* RO!V Pw++ Fq Nd** RP+ G++ Au Mm+
|
May 15th, 2006, 04:49 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 2,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Well, since the "colony" has no population, facilities, units or anything else, you cannot destroy it. For a colony to be "destroyed" in combat, you need to kill off all the population, but since said colony never had any population to start with, it is untouchable and can only be removed A.) by the owner or B.) by a solar nuke. Power to the empty colonies.
__________________
O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
-Stargate SG1
|
May 15th, 2006, 05:17 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Well, destroying the planet will probably work.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
May 15th, 2006, 10:53 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 2,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Troops and Happiness question
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't destroy a planet with a colony? Could be mistaken, I guess.
__________________
O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
-Stargate SG1
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Asteroids Champion!
Linear Mode
