fire blessing lvl 9 : armorpiercing 8 ap fire weapons ? anti-vq strat discussing

[Boron]

does this mean the fire bless lvl 9 user gets +8 damage and armor piercing on his attacks ?

or something different ?

and do weapon of sharpness give ap or an attacks ?
iirc ap

resistences stack up so does ap from fire blessing + ap from weapons of sharpness stack up to armor negating ?

furthermore the lance attack is described ap so does he stack up to an with fire bless ?

[ July 31, 2004, 01:17: Message edited by: Boron ]

[Graeme Dice]

Originally posted by Boron:
does this mean the fire bless lvl 9 user gets +8 damage and armor piercing on his attacks ?

If I understand the mechanism correctly, the primary weapon gets an additional 8 fire damage, armour piercing attack added everytime it hits. The weapon is also made magical.

and do weapon of sharpness give ap or an attacks ?

Weapons of Sharpness makes the targets weapons armour piercing.

resistences stack up so does ap from fire blessing + ap from weapons of sharpness stack up to armor negating ?

Armour piercing doesn't "stack" at all. Your weapons are either normal, armour piercing, or armour negating. What weapons of sharpness will do is make the normal, physical part of the damage armour piercing.

furthermore the lance attack is described ap so does he stack up to an with fire bless ?

Lances are not armour piercing. The AP acronym stands for action points. Lance damage is dependent on the amount of action points that the unit has at some unknown point during its turn.

[Arryn]

Originally posted by Boron:
does this mean the fire bless lvl 9 user gets +8 damage and armor piercing on his attacks ?

+4 attack, +8 ap fire damage

and do weapon of sharpness give ap or an attacks ?

ap

resistences stack up so does ap from fire blessing + ap from weapons of sharpness stack up to armor negating ?

ap + ap != an

furthermore the lance attack is described ap so does he stack up to an with fire bless ?

no, see answer above

[ July 28, 2004, 17:22: Message edited by: Arryn ]

[archaeolept]

umm, as i understand it, the 8 damage AP attack is resolved separately from the normal damage attack; ie. they do not add together.

[PrinzMegaherz]

Archaeolept wrote:
umm, as i understand it, the 8 damage AP attack is resolved separately from the normal damage attack; ie. they do not add together.

Hm, I think it does. How else could fire 9 tuatha kill ulmish infantry so easily?

[Arryn]

Originally posted by archaeolept:
umm, as i understand it, the 8 damage AP attack is resolved separately from the normal damage attack; ie. they do not add together.

AFAIK, you are correct.