Combat results log

[PhilD]

The second question in this poll is a perfect example of what a poll should NOT ask: you ask "who is best suited to deciding what we want", while the question you're really asking is, "who should decide what is best for the game".

Obviously, this is a point that may be debated, but there's nothing to poll about. (I still cast my vote in favor or logs, but honestly, they'd be more work for the devs than they're really worth)

[Arryn]

Originally posted by PhilD:
The second question in this poll is a perfect example of what a poll should NOT ask: you ask "who is best suited to deciding what we want", while the question you're really asking is, "who should decide what is best for the game".

"Who is best suited to deciding what we want" is actually what I intended to mean. I'm guilty of poor phrasing. For that, I apologize.

[Arryn]

Originally posted by Pocus:
Developpers are players, dont forget that (well its true for IW at least!). And the commitment they have done for dominions dwarf, by definition, any commitment that even the most zealout fan can do.

Since you play HoI, you should appreciate that this isn't always true. Paradox, the developers of HoI, consults closely with the C.O.R.E. team (which has practically re-written that entire game), and frequently incorporates many of their changes into the official code. Of course, Paradox has exposed their AI to modding, and IW hasn't (at least not yet).

[ March 07, 2004, 12:30: Message edited by: Arryn ]

[Kel]

Heh, I am torn.

Making combat reports easier to use and more helpful is the area I would most love to see development in. The area of the game that people seem to have the least control in is the combat results so being able to both learn from them and see results reasonably quickly (IE. not having to restart a 5 minute battle because you missed something) is fairly important (not just to me, I suspect).

A long log of results would satisfy one area, making it easier to analyze the results but, at the same time, contributes nothing to the speed at which one can do so.

As far as AAR's, they are nice, I appreciate reading them...but, afaik, the majority of people don't write AAR's, nor would they even do so if they had a log of combat events. If slider controls or advance/reverse turn buttons aren't possible, a text log would be an ok substitution but I wouldn't do it mainly for the sake of AAR's.

As far as needs vs. wants, don't forget that they aren't mutually exclusive. I would say that while our needs and our wants certainly can diverge, they are, perhaps even more often, the same thing.

Last comment, it's only really partly true that it's the developers game. They are responsible for, deserve credit for, and are in charge of, the code...and I am not, AT ALL, saying that any developer 'owes' gamers any continued development (except for bug fixes). That said, the game wouldn't have been distributed if people weren't buying it so let's not act as if this is freeware your friend wrote for you in his spare time and noone has any right to ask for something more in the face of such altruism.

Sorry it got long, kind of a response to a lot of thoughts that have been discussed lately

- Kel

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
While this attitude would seem an obvious one to someone who has played games, its a big surprise if you administer a game to find out that the players are definetly NOT the right people to ask what a game needs.

That is because, as a general rule, by and large, people are idiots and don't know what they really want or what they're asking for.

As one who's administered a game in the past, I find that certain individuals are very good at making suggestions, while the bulk of the population tends to snivel and whine for things that are either completely unfeasible, or have immediately forseeable negative consequences (that they are either unable to see, or deliberately hoping you won't).

Generally, I find it best to deal with such players by harsh punishments, generally administered discreetly through code. In this way, I can discredit the offending player by making him appear even more incompetent, so nobody will take him seriously, and he will be subjected to mockery and ostracism by his peers.

By pitting players against each other in such a manner, I distract the common rabble from any issues which might give them cause to complain, and instead focus their ire on their fellow players. This way, they stop bothering me and kill each other.

[ March 08, 2004, 05:53: Message edited by: Norfleet ]

[Peter Ebbesen]

Originally posted by AStott:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peter Ebbesen:
Regarding turn-logs, there is a very simple justification for the need: AAR writing.

In my experience, games that have turn logs that are used for AAR writing only end up in a number of AARs that are boring to read. Mostly because people use them as a crutch to actually writing something. Do I want to be innundated by dull AARs? No thanks.

---

You, sir, obviously have not been reading EU2, HOI, or Victoria AARs. What is a crutch for the crippled can be a gift for the gifted.

[Psitticine]

No, but he has been reading Machiavelli's book on game admining.