|
|
|
|
|
March 8th, 2004, 01:09 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Ah, I think you're right, thanks. That was a bad one all right.
PvK
|
March 8th, 2004, 04:13 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Is it possible to upgrade a level 1 facility to level 2 after you have researched level 3?
Because everytime I go to a planet to upgrade a level 1 the only upgrade option I see its the level 3.
It appears that the level 3 overrides the level 2 or something, so the only thing I can do its to not research level 3.
__________________
Traits:
Siegebreaker: +1 command when under siege
Good-looking: +1 influence
Social drinker: +1 influence
Obsessional trainer: +1 morale to troops, forced march
Devout: -1 influence
Administratively inept: -2 management
Retinue:
|
March 8th, 2004, 06:45 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
The upgrade is fully intended to upgrade older, obselete facilities built before you got the latest tech level to the latest level of facility, so no, you can not do that. Too bad obselete facilities can not be made unbuildable. :-\
|
March 9th, 2004, 01:21 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Too bad the latest facilities can not be made unupgradable-to.
PvK
|
March 9th, 2004, 01:27 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Yes, for mods like Proportions that would be good. We just need more options!
|
March 9th, 2004, 01:32 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
Too bad the latest facilities can not be made unupgradable-to.
PvK
|
That is simple is it not? Same facility name, different family number = no upgrade, correct?
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
March 9th, 2004, 03:42 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 59
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
well, this is the way I handle it:
if you choose Hardly industrial every SY will build 2500, enough for lvl 3. (but I usually dont choose HI)
instead I try to get to min lvl 2 and applied research lvl 2 pretty fast, focusing on these facilities to be build (instead of the lvl 1)
before I research lvl 3 of them I try to research the upgraded SY (prefered both levels at once, so I only need one upgrade per planet, but that might be too expensive sometimes.) this means I research lvl 3 res and mins pretty late, obviously.
If I somehow get lvl 3 earlier (through tech trade -> minerals, or through ruins) I do the following.
I usually play with an construction rate of 120% so I only need 100 mio pop on every planet to build them in one turn. if I am able to distribute this population in time I build the SY first, and then build the lvl 3 facilities. if I am not able to get the necessary pop amount to that planet I dont build a SY, but build lvl 2 facilities instead. I build my SY in the end and then upgrade the facilities. usually I start building lvl 2 fasc. and 5 turns before my transport arrives I start building a SY. (however, on small planets its usually smarter to build lvl 2 facilities.)
in anyway, forget the upgrade all button as soon as you research lvl 3.
|
March 9th, 2004, 03:47 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
It's not such a big deal, so it takes two turns instead of one if you don't have enough population/construction bonuses. Eventually the planet will become full and sit around and do nothing anyways.
|
March 9th, 2004, 04:28 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Quote:
Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
It's not such a big deal, so it takes two turns instead of one if you don't have enough population/construction bonuses. Eventually the planet will become full and sit around and do nothing anyways.
|
It's much more than just another turn.
If you take advanced storage techniques, a huge world has 30 slots. Filling it up in 30 turns instead of 60 turns is a big improvement. Replace the Last slot with the appropriate planetary booster facility and while that's being built, queue up the upgrade for the remaining slots. Then finally use emergency build when there is a total of 1.5 years left and you have maximized your output. Sure, it costs a little more, but if you are talking minerals, it pays for itself. If you are talking orgs or rads, with a resource converter, it also pays for itself. For research or intel, I also like doing this because it's all about bringing in points sooner.
To each his own, and Fyron need not reply again saying this is cheesy. I'm sure that there are no other point maximizers out there besides me anyway, so this discussion is just for academic purposes. Nor has anyone posted an article about max/minning race characteristics, because that's also covered in cheese whiz.
Slick.
__________________
Slick.
|
March 9th, 2004, 04:32 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
I'm sure you could transport enough population in the stock game to alleviate about 20-25 of those additional turns.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|