OT: And you thought the world was sane... - Page 2

Roanon · #11 August 24th, 2003, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tigbit:
Personally I find it going too far to enforce correct eating habits.

Especially as it is VERY doubtful what "correct" eating habits are. All this diet stuff, sugar-free sugar, salt-free salt, fat-free fat and other chemical stuff that seems to be so popular among health fanatics in the US is definitely NOT healthy.

[ August 24, 2003, 02:31: Message edited by: Roanon ]

DavidG · #12 August 24th, 2003, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tigbit:
When a kid's parent can sue a verocious dog owner for tearing his little boy apart after sending him in the yard (with signs on the fence stating clearly that the yard contains a bloodthirsty dog) to retrieve a frisbe

This guy's damn lucky he only got sued. He should be thrown in jail IMO.

Fyron · #13 August 24th, 2003, 05:14 AM

Why? The kid should not have been tresspassing on his property.

mottlee · #14 August 24th, 2003, 05:42 AM

I worked with someone a few years ago...he had a Rot that was chained up in the back yard in full view and he had to have it put down when some kid took a short cut that was in reach of the chain

Fyron · #15 August 24th, 2003, 05:51 AM

It is called natural selection. Humans can't escape it.

Tigbit · #16 August 24th, 2003, 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavidG:

quote:
Originally posted by Tigbit:
When a kid's parent can sue a verocious dog owner for tearing his little boy apart after sending him in the yard (with signs on the fence stating clearly that the yard contains a bloodthirsty dog) to retrieve a frisbe

This guy's damn lucky he only got sued. He should be thrown in jail IMO.

Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

Fyron · #17 August 24th, 2003, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

Nobody! Go survival of the fittest!

Tigbit · #18 August 24th, 2003, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:

quote:
Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

Nobody! Go survival of the fittest!

We finally agree on something.

Fyron · #19 August 24th, 2003, 08:41 AM

Bound to happen eventually.

Suicide Junkie · #20 August 24th, 2003, 04:43 PM

City people should all get happyfluffypuppy dogs. Where the worst they do is slobber on you