|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
November 20th, 2008, 10:48 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marek_Tucan
Quote:
Originally Posted by troopie
Good idea. And a paracommando unit class.
|
I'd rather like offboard SAM first, am not a spec ops kind
But now seriously, I have fdorgotten answer already, so... Would it be possible to have a "beaten zone" effect for HMG's and MMG's wherever they're mounted? Mening mostly forts, as they are now quite weak re. causing suppression, compared to normal MG units.
|
Fort class (And bunker class in WW2) now generates blast circle for MG type weapons (Type=3 and wh=1). (5 minute fix ). 1 MG unit class was also missing from the filter in MBT - added.
MBT - the AGL class was not generating a blast circle. Bug! . Fixed.
Also - with a little tricky code the engine now determines if a class 3 weapon is an AGL, and generates a blast circle for these. So a Land Rover WMIK with GMG or BTR80+AGS is somewhat more effective!.
Andy
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 20th, 2008, 12:51 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Land of the Sabbath and of the Priest
Posts: 242
Thanks: 35
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
MBT - the AGL class was not generating a blast circle. Bug! . Fixed.
Andy
|
Good show - up to now they have been pretty useless: less use than a 2in Mortar!
|
November 20th, 2008, 03:24 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Thanks very much, Andy!
Fast feedback (be it positive, as in this case, or negative, with many uncodable wild ideas) by developpers is one of the things I appreciate the most with WinSPMBT/SPWW2 (apart from it being a really great game). Thanks once again.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
January 17th, 2009, 01:06 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Posts: 76
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
For campaigns PBEM and Human vs Computer.
Abandoned enemy technics and grasped by the opponent to add to the Core force.
|
February 2nd, 2009, 05:09 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Posts: 76
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
To make so that abandoned vechicles were evacuated in tank transporter.
|
February 17th, 2009, 05:41 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Hi:
Just want to toss this out again.
How about adding in a video feature. I can think of at least 3 ways, probably from easiest to hardest.
a) Concatenate the playback from each players turn.
b) Record the script for each unit action and results, then provide it at the end of the game. May require a standalone player to play the scrip, although I think the core of the player can be stripped from the game.
b) Like, "b", but record keystrokes also in the sequence. Thus you can see things like switching guns off, artillery assignments by which FO, etc.
Option (a) is probably the easiest, since I think all that is needed is to pipe the replay to a separate file for playing and extend it after each turn. This will make a nice game playback, although a bit choppy. Probably 3rd party software to do this, since it is simply a fancy screen capture (video pipe).
Option (b) is probably the happy middle ground. Downside, most likely will require recompile of the engine unless it has a debug feature that already permits this. Also, have to hold final generation until game ends to avoid cheating. Good points - much smoother battle replay, good for training sessions, and good for discouraging any most cheating.
Option (c) Slightly more complicated than (b), but would be the ultimate in training and the ultimate in cheat detection.
Please comment.
Thanks
|
February 18th, 2009, 04:10 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Quote:
How about adding in a video feature.
Option (c) Slightly more complicated than (b), but would be the ultimate in training and the ultimate in cheat detection
|
I am guessing a lot of work for a feature that does not realy add anything.
Using for cheat detection esp if shows averything as per C could go on for ages.
Big game 15 min replay for first 10 or so turns till units dwindle that would be over 3 hours for a 20 turn game.
Big replays take over 10mins just seeing engaged units & thats with fast arty on
|
February 19th, 2009, 04:05 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Can't argue about the value, that is too subjective.
The cheating part is more of a side-effect, but would/could be a discourager against those seeking to looking to cheat if there is an audit trail.
As for length of time, actually the video should be less than the game if using time compression.
I still like the training and other multimedia options that come to mind.
Feel free to toss in the burn bag. I think for those who are really interested in pursuing, there are a lot of free video capture programs. So just need two agreeable people with the ability to cut and splice digital video to do this manually.
|
February 19th, 2009, 04:52 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Quote:
Feel free to toss in the burn bag. I think for those who are really interested in pursuing, there are a lot of free video capture programs.
|
Was not wishing to sound dismisive putting forward ideas is in my view not a bad thing its more of a priority thing. Things that make a diffrence to improve gameplay take priority. The more sweeping the improvement the more important generaly.
Only so many hours in the day blah blah
|
February 28th, 2009, 02:46 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Posts: 76
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideas how to improve WinSP MBT/WW2 !
Many times we (fans WinSP) are asked by a question...
Why from falling (it is destroyed by air defence) fighter-bomber does not jump out crew?
It probably to make in WinSP ?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|