|
|
|
|
|
July 18th, 2008, 06:58 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
There are just few games submitted to hall of fame. And many many of them are newbie games, there are also team games, etc etc.
|
July 18th, 2008, 11:48 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Team games COULD be used to look for survivability, etc. But yes, prime reason this can't be enough is that there are just too few of them...
|
July 18th, 2008, 05:05 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Quote:
thejeff said:
If one nation has won twice out of 20 games is it twice as powerful as a nation that has only won once? Or even twice as likely to win?
|
No. But if you find that the 4 nations that win more total 50% of the victories, and happen to be 4 nations with strong sacreds, and that most of the nations that has never won dont have strong sacreds, or sacreds at all, that might be a trend.
2vs1 is not relevant. 4 vs 0 is a bit more (even if not deffinitive)
|
July 18th, 2008, 05:29 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Agreed. I think it's clear to all that LA Ermor and R'lyeh are powerhouses.
The other eras are closer.
And it's very hard to draw any conclusions about the low end. Where there are multiple nations that haven't won at all.
|
July 18th, 2008, 09:24 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
But they're just so thematically KOOOOOOOL!!!!
__________________
IN UN LAMPO DI GLORIA!
|
July 19th, 2008, 01:44 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Some of the strong nations are as well thematically cool (ermor MA is a good example imho). Some nations that are very low end are not the "coolest" ones thematically as well. So that's not a cause-effect relationship.
|
July 19th, 2008, 03:34 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Quote:
triqui said:
Some of the strong nations are as well thematically cool (ermor MA is a good example imho). Some nations that are very low end are not the "coolest" ones thematically as well. So that's not a cause-effect relationship.
|
But then, some of the low-end nation are very cool. EA Agartha is awesome...
|
July 19th, 2008, 08:06 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
To add an extra evaluations:
MA Shinuyama: 2-5-4-2-2. (weak army for early expansion, lack of sacreds and low morale make them attractive nation to be rushed. Later, they have access to very strong army buffs and one of the best, if not the best, and more cost effective mages in the game which happen to be non-capital. Late game they have strong Death which means strong thugs and Tartarian factory, and easy access to game-winning BE like Army of Gold+Heat from hell)
|
July 26th, 2008, 05:13 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Bump?
|
July 27th, 2008, 05:16 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
This thread kind of bobs up and down a bit. I really should edit those first posts to reflect my easing of the restrictions for posting ratings. I guess I just overestimated the number of oldtimers who would find this interesting enough to take the time. Hmmmm, maybe this will finally get me to drag myself into IRC and bug some people there.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|