Fyron's 5000th Post - Page 14

Fyron · #**131** April 17th, 2003, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
strength. go boom. no wall.
and my point is that everything has to have an oposite.

Yes, and your point is wrong. Nearly everything in existence does not have an opposite.

ZeroAdunn · #**132** April 17th, 2003, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:

quote:
Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
strength. go boom. no wall.
and my point is that everything has to have an oposite.

Yes, and your point is wrong. Nearly everything in existence does not have an opposite.

You are even more wrong fyron, you see, everything is its own oposite, why, just look at cats.....

ZeroAdunn · #**133** April 17th, 2003, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by David E. Gervais:
Fyron, this thread has been running for 7 days and it started with (actually the second post) you making your 5000'th post. You're now at 5180+ Posts.

WoW!, It's worth repeating WOW!

That's an average of 25+ Posts per day. You are not only the ruler of the world, you're crusing at warp 10!

I'm impressed, and a wee bit jealous! (..and to think the 7th day is not over yet!)

Have a Great Day, Cheers!

Did I miss the meeting when it was declared we were going to praise people for being wind bags?

Seriously though, I would ask for a muzzle, but that wouldn't stop him from typing....

Fyron · #**134** April 17th, 2003, 10:53 PM

I am in no way a windbag. I have had a lot of answers to questions asked on Shrapnel, and answered them. This doesn't make me a windbag.

Cyrien · #**135** April 17th, 2003, 11:36 PM

wind�bag
n.
The flexible air-filled chamber of a bagpipe or similar instrument.
Slang. A talkative person who communicates nothing of substance or interest.

I don't think Fyron fits in there for the most part.

I haven't actually seen him for myself though so I suppose he might be a sentient flexible air-filled chamber of a bagpipe or similar instrument.

narf poit chez BOOM · #**136** April 18th, 2003, 04:18 AM

you havn't proven me wrong.

and i think i have come up with oposites that wouldn't exist without each other. are we doing more than going in circles, though?

Fyron · #**137** April 18th, 2003, 05:19 AM

I never said there are no opposites that would not exist without each other. But your point was that everything that exists must have an opposite. This is what I have argued is wrong. There are many things out there without opposites, and they exist just fine.

narf poit chez BOOM · #**138** April 18th, 2003, 09:08 AM

i came up with one for a clock

but i don't think this is going anywhere. we've started to repeat ourselves.

Fyron · #**139** April 18th, 2003, 09:53 AM

Yeah... I already showed how your argument for an opposite to a clock was invalid...

narf poit chez BOOM · #**140** April 18th, 2003, 10:12 AM

where?

[ April 18, 2003, 09:13: Message edited by: narf poit chez BOOM ]