.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

The Star & the Crescent- Save $9.00
winSPWW2- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPWW2
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd, 2014, 07:28 AM
Turret's Avatar

Turret Turret is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 79
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Turret is on a distinguished road
Default Too Much Ammo

How is it realistic to give troops small arms ammunition ratings of 90? To my mind (I'm no expert), the infantry might be more realistically modelled as having ammo ratings of say, 30.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 23rd, 2014, 07:48 AM

zastava128 zastava128 is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Croatia
Posts: 162
Thanks: 86
Thanked 80 Times in 67 Posts
zastava128 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

You may want to have a look at Cross's mod. It's out of date now, but you can use his guidelines to edit your OOBs.

Link: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=46493
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 23rd, 2014, 09:16 AM

RedGuard RedGuard is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
RedGuard is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

Agreed. Infantries seem to have infinite ammo when playing a short battle. Their gunfire is almost endless. Some opponents use Z without any scruple.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 29th, 2014, 06:34 PM
troopie's Avatar

troopie troopie is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Die Operasionale Gebied
Posts: 373
Thanks: 103
Thanked 86 Times in 56 Posts
troopie is on a distinguished road
Default This Reminds Me of an Earlier Thread

and a discussion on the old Yahoo List where the armoured okes were amazed at the ammo loads we footies carried. Yes we were truly Malan's Mules.

I carried an average of 240 rounds for my R-1 on patrol. I never carried less than two hundred, and often carried three hundred. I remember that I never carried the same exact load twice.

troopie

R-1 rounds are rifle rounds only. That doesn't include the bunker bombs, grenades, FN-MAG belts or pistol and pistol rounds carried.
__________________
Pamwe Chete
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 29th, 2014, 09:25 PM
DRG's Avatar

DRG DRG is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,498
Thanks: 3,967
Thanked 5,705 Times in 2,816 Posts
DRG will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

Rifle Cartridge Cartridge weight Weight of loaded magazine 10 kg (22#) ammo load
M14 7.62×51mm 393 grains (25.5 g) 20 rds @ 0.68 kg 14 mags / 280 rds
M16 5.56×45mm 183 grains (11.9 g) 20 rds @ 0.3 kg 33 mags / 660 rds
AK-47 7.62×39mm 281 grains (18.2 g) 30 rds @ 1.2 kg*[8] 8 mags / 240 rds
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old May 31st, 2014, 09:19 AM

Artofwar Artofwar is offline
Private
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 38
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Artofwar is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

But if you finally get a day off from work and you are engaging in some recreational time and finally have a chance to play Steel Panthers and for some reason you are actually using good tactics and having a good battle it can be a real Mind Melt down to then notice your troops running out of ammo.

We carry 140 rounds .223 where I work and 46 rounds of glock .40 ammo and so in the event I am still alive after the initial attack and some of my buddies are gone I will as needed and if possible without getting shot up ... get their ammo.

Last edited by Artofwar; May 31st, 2014 at 09:22 AM.. Reason: add more info
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 31st, 2014, 09:57 PM
Turret's Avatar

Turret Turret is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 79
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Turret is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

Ammo carriers could have a more important role in the game, if ammo counts were lowered.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 31st, 2014, 11:53 PM
Mobhack's Avatar

Mobhack Mobhack is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,958
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,900 Times in 1,238 Posts
Mobhack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turret View Post
Ammo carriers could have a more important role in the game, if ammo counts were lowered.
They are already a big cheat for the human player, since the AI has absolutely no knowledge of the things.

If you would like to add them to the AI - please do suggest an algorithm that would work, without the CPU kamikaze-charging ammo trucks out into the bullet-swept front lines to top off Corporal Snuffy's rifle section which is down by 10 rounds. Or should Corporal Snuffy retire to the rear zone to top off?. If so, should he bring the rest of the platoon so he stays in command distance of platoon HQ, and if that drags his company HQ back, well then... Or is that ATGM team in the wood more worthy of a visit, or the mortar section, or the empty SAM up on the hill (surrounded by enemy paras)?.

And yes, I have looked at the problem in the past and not seen any sane solution for the AI and ammo resupply.

But you may have a better idea - if so, please express it in C or at least pseudo-code for us.

Then again perhaps we should just treat the units like other board and tabletop wargames do, and ignore ammo resupply completely, on the premise that units have enough for a typical engagement?.

Andy
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old June 1st, 2014, 09:01 AM
Cross's Avatar

Cross Cross is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK / USA
Posts: 895
Thanks: 32
Thanked 281 Times in 123 Posts
Cross is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turret View Post
Ammo carriers could have a more important role in the game, if ammo counts were lowered.
When playing against the AI, humans have quite a few advantages, ammo resupply is just one of them.
I agree with Andy's suggestion that if you're playing against the AI and want to limit one of those advantages, then don't buy ammo resupply units.

For PBEM games, you are right that ammo resupply would become more important, and both should buy resupply units.

When I've played with my low ammo infantry mod against the AI, I did not buy ammo resupply, and I found that only a few of my infantry units might have a SMG or rifle slot run out of ammo.

AI infantry units were less likely to run low on ammo - in my battles - because they were on the losing side. The winning side is the one whose infantry will generally run low on ammo first. Which means low ammo will usually help the AI, because it helps limit human dominance over the AI.



Cross
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 1st, 2014, 11:53 AM

PvtJoker PvtJoker is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 144
Thanks: 12
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
PvtJoker is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too Much Ammo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turret View Post
Ammo carriers could have a more important role in the game, if ammo counts were lowered.
And yes, I have looked at the problem in the past and not seen any sane solution for the AI and ammo resupply.

Andy
A comprehensive solution would require a very sophisticated AI, there is no doubt about that. The way I would suggest to do it would be to limit AI ammo resupply to indirect fire units (mortars and on-map arty). These are the units that in real life are the most likely to receive additional ammo during a battle and if they run out of ammo, it has the biggest overall negative effect on combat effectiveness of the whole force. They are also usually placed the farthest away from enemy units (even by AI), which would diminish the possibility of AI supply vehicles running into player units. Of course that would still happen all the time, but it wouldn't be as stupid or unrealistic as trying to resupply a frontline infantry unit with an horse drawn ammo cart...

Last edited by PvtJoker; June 1st, 2014 at 11:54 AM.. Reason: Spelling and clarification
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.