|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
April 17th, 2007, 01:51 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Uk\'s MBT-LAW
It's disponible in-game in 2007, as planned by Uk's ministry of defense, is it true?
I'm amazed by this missile because it's a TA-ATGM and it has a better penetration than a maverick! Has anybody confirmation than this missile is already in service and so efficient?
I just discovered it when playing against a player with germany in 2007; his poor Leo II were disabled in a few turns, without any possibility to strike back!
__________________
"On 17 January, I started with 39 tanks. After 38 days of aerial attacks, I had 32, but in less than 20 minutes with the M1A1,1 had zero." an Iraqi
battalion commander, after being captured by the 2nd Armored Cav Regiment, speeking to Col Don Holder.
|
April 17th, 2007, 05:08 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
It is unit 235, even if I didn't ask for any change...
__________________
"On 17 January, I started with 39 tanks. After 38 days of aerial attacks, I had 32, but in less than 20 minutes with the M1A1,1 had zero." an Iraqi
battalion commander, after being captured by the 2nd Armored Cav Regiment, speeking to Col Don Holder.
|
April 17th, 2007, 05:20 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
It's a top attack missle. They do attack the weakest bits on a tank
Don
|
April 17th, 2007, 05:54 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
Quote:
DRG said:
It's a top attack missile. They do attack the weakest bits on a tank
Don
|
That's just why I miss the interess of being able to penetrate 150cm of anti-HEAT armour when best roof are around 20cm, and that no DC-ATGM are able to penetrate a so great thickness... Why not give them such a warhead (in game, best DC have a 100 to 120 penetration, against face hull/turret up to 170 in the worst case)
But if I understand you correctly, this value is just in-game to assure a more frequent success of this weapon, maybe because of a better system or something else?
In fact what shocks me is that it seems pretty unlogical to have such a warhead, when only a 5 times smaller is needed...
Cheers
Loktarr
__________________
"On 17 January, I started with 39 tanks. After 38 days of aerial attacks, I had 32, but in less than 20 minutes with the M1A1,1 had zero." an Iraqi
battalion commander, after being captured by the 2nd Armored Cav Regiment, speeking to Col Don Holder.
|
April 17th, 2007, 07:03 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
So it's not the fact that it can kill just about anything it's fired at it's the number we choose to represent that fact that's bothering you. Tell you what...... you find me hard info on the actual armour penetration of a Bofors MBT-LAW and I'll read it and if we are wrong. I'll fix it
OK?
Don
|
April 17th, 2007, 08:07 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
Quote:
DRG said:
So it's not the fact that it can kill just about anything it's fired at it's the number we choose to represent that fact that's bothering you.
Don
|
It doesn't bother me and I never asked for modifications of game values; my question was if the value was the consequence of a revolutionar penetrator or "the fact that it can kill just about anything it's fired at": your present answer is the only thing I asked for.
Now, if you want to know if I think that this value is too high, my is NO, because I never saw any MBT-LAW in action, probably never will and my guess is that some of the OOB maker did.
Thank you for your answer and sorry , but I was just trying to understand something, not to upset you.
Loktarr
__________________
"On 17 January, I started with 39 tanks. After 38 days of aerial attacks, I had 32, but in less than 20 minutes with the M1A1,1 had zero." an Iraqi
battalion commander, after being captured by the 2nd Armored Cav Regiment, speeking to Col Don Holder.
|
May 7th, 2007, 04:04 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
I'll look into this in the fall
Don
|
May 8th, 2007, 12:54 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
OK, now I'm curious.
The Javelin (OOB 12 US Army and OOB 13 USMC, weapon 143) is also a top attack missile and has a HEAT Pen of 45.
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the Javelin actually have a higher warhead weight/penetration then the MBT LAW ?
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
May 8th, 2007, 02:18 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Uk\'s MBT-LAW
Well you guys have a few months to dig up the answer. I'll be interested to see what you find out
Don
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|