|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
July 5th, 2005, 07:28 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 312
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Possible bug in airborne drops
I'm not sure if this is a bug or an undocumented design feature. I am in the middle of designing my 1st scenario and during Alpha testing noticed some really bizarre behaviour regarding Airborne Drops.
Question: Do certain types of LEG Infantry have a penalty for taking damage during a drop?
|
July 5th, 2005, 08:37 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
IIRC: Yes, anything other than a Para or Airborne APC/Light Tank takes extra damage in a drop.
|
July 5th, 2005, 09:41 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
Yeah, they don't take too kindly to being pushed out of the aircraft without a parachute...
|
July 5th, 2005, 10:24 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH (Yeah I know, you don\'t need to say anything)
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
Also, don't let the Airborne Light Tank / APC fool you. They are not dropable. There is a long post on this subject under paratrooper question
|
July 6th, 2005, 03:05 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
All infantry types take damage on drop, even dedicated para units. Admittedly they tend to lose less guys and take less suppression, because of supposed better training.
Other infantry types tend to break necks all to often, but that is meant to compensate for the fact that the game allows vehicles to be dropped ready to go.
Also watch out on what ground they land: it is very hard to swim under a parachute or the land feet first with 80lb. pack in a rock garden. Oh, always better than head first!
|
July 6th, 2005, 08:04 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 77
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
I feel the need to repeat myself: In the case of BMDs at least, there will ALWAYS be causalties (and the BMD only has a crew of 2). This can't be tolerated, as it's over the edge of silly.
__________________
What would Cliff Richard do?
|
July 6th, 2005, 08:17 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
So you expect to strap a 'chute on a BMD and toss it out of the back of a plane and it coming out of this without any scratch??
Obviously, the makers/deployers of the thing do think that way, too:
"The BMD-3 can be airdropped from transport aircraft with the complete crew of seven men remaining inside the vehicle. In the past, the crew was dropped separately, and it often took a considerable time for them to locate the vehicle."
http://www.armscontrol.ru/atmtc/Arms...cles.htm#bmd-3
I would be interested in real figures about drop casualties, though
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
July 6th, 2005, 08:42 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
Ittakes a way braver man than me to be straped into a AFV, rigged with a chute and pushed out of a aircraft.
Sorry, I might jump with the rest of the men(trid to join Army but no MCL, no ACL no join) but not in a AFV. I think I would need to see where I am falling to. even if I can't do anthing about it.
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|
July 6th, 2005, 09:04 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 77
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
If the unit is labeled "airborne" I don't see a reason the size greater than a molecule for why one should have this feature if one can't get the crew down in one piece! I'm not arguing that it's realistic or unrealistic, well I actually am, but if it is a "realistic" feature which has been added by intention, I think that realism could be much more well spent somewhere else.
Why would you buy a tank platoon if the tracks fell apart after 500 metres?
@SC: I think the crews are parachuted separatly, at least in Russia. That, or given great amounts of vodka. (Or maybe both.) Unfortunately, that is impossible to do in winSP, at least to this date.
__________________
What would Cliff Richard do?
|
July 6th, 2005, 10:32 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Possible bug in airborne drops
It might take great amounts of vodka to get me in a BMD much less drop in one. I can't believe the Russian would drop the crews but you can never tell. The Soviets might of.
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|