|
|
|
|
January 20th, 2005, 01:52 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
For purposes of determining sequence of orders, who owns a province that has a fort under siege? The sieger or the defenders?
Specifically, I'd like to know the order of the following events:
1) I'm sieging a fort and I set my orders to "Storm Castle".
2) The defending player sets orders for an army in an adjacent province to move into the besieged province.
Who moves first? Do I storm the castle and fight the defenders *before* the other player's army attacks?
Thanks!
|
January 20th, 2005, 02:01 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
It does not matter who owns the castle. The 'Storm Castle' order always comes after movement as well as any other type battles. An army moving in will fight the seigers before storming the castle.
By the way, the province is owned by the seiging army while the fort is owned by the defenders. The gold income from the province is split between the two owners. I think the money split is 50-50, but not sure on this one. The castle owner gets the gem income, though, which is definitely counter-intuitive.
|
January 20th, 2005, 02:13 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
Also for the concern of VP, the player owning the castle is the one who get the VP ... so conquering the province is not enough for getting the VP
Liga
|
January 20th, 2005, 02:52 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
Quote:
liga said:
Also for the concern of VP, the player owning the castle is the one who get the VP ... so conquering the province is not enough for getting the VP
|
You mean I have to take the castle to get the Vice President?! Nonsense!
(okay, what is 'VP' again? I'm thinking Victory Points...)
|
January 20th, 2005, 04:55 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
Quote:
Huntsman said:
(okay, what is 'VP' again? I'm thinking Victory Points...)
|
Yes.
|
January 20th, 2005, 05:14 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
Quote:
The Panther said:
By the way, the province is owned by the seiging army while the fort is owned by the defenders.
|
This leads to me to another question:
If I move my sieging army out of the province and into an adjacent province owned by me, will my moves be completed before the enemy's? Friendly moves go first, right?
|
January 20th, 2005, 10:30 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Who \"owns\" a province with besieged fort?
Movement is simultaneous. Your army moves out and the new army moves it at once, taking the same amount of time to move for either side. You therefore never meet in battle unless you are crossing your armies into each other's provinces. In that case, there is a probablility that your armies will spot each other during movement and fight in one of the two provinces. I have never seen a formula for this probablitity, but it is supposed to be based on the total sizes of the army. This is presumably because larger armies are easier to spot than smaller ones.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|