|
|
|
|
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:08 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wizard\'s Tower
Posts: 603
Thanks: 26
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
whats the deal with this, i didnt miss any turn and now im saled. looks like llama didnt give me the turn 25
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:11 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
Oops... Maybe a bug indeed. What may we do?
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:12 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wizard\'s Tower
Posts: 603
Thanks: 26
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
could we go back? i didnt receive the turn 25 mail
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:16 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
Hm. Let's discuss it.
Rehosts are in most cases very bad option and it is really so. Maybe we may compensate your stale somehow. For example, if each nation sends you something like several gems or gold?
edit: also, email problems do happen time to time and it may very well be a problem of general email system or of your email server. I think it is even more likely than llamaserver problem in this case.
You should always check the game page at llamaserver and game thread here if you don't receive email with turns for a period longer than hosting interval.
Last edited by ano; April 21st, 2009 at 05:23 PM..
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:26 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wizard\'s Tower
Posts: 603
Thanks: 26
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
I dont think loosing this turn is ok to me
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:29 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
I won't make a rehost on my own. Rehosts ALWAYS lead to situations when someone receives worse or much worse results than before and it is always a short way to conflicts and long-long discussions.
The only solution I can suggest it to pause the game, discuss the problem here and perform some voting.
Will send a message to everybody via llamaserver now.
|
April 21st, 2009, 05:50 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
I must say I'm voting against and it's not because I've had some terrible luck this turn. Nothing like that. I just know what rollbacks usually lead to.
If you insist that this stale was absolutely crucial for you, I don't mind a rollback though.
|
April 21st, 2009, 08:20 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 69
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
I'll abstain from voing.
|
April 21st, 2009, 11:51 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
Doesnt matter to me either way.
|
April 21st, 2009, 11:55 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 731
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Heracles - LA game, Running
Also indifferent - unless a player is likely to be severely disadvantaged (launched surprise attack, major battle went well, etc) by a rollback I feel we should accommodate Torin
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|