|
|
|
|
|
March 9th, 2004, 09:57 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
The Capitol Building in Washington D.C. was originally built without the giant dome you see today. The building was built in a rush and congress was using it for years before the Level III Dome Upgrade was completed.
Shall we go on?
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
March 9th, 2004, 11:36 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Quote:
Originally posted by Slick:
It is not an exploit. <- period.
Slick.
|
I think it is more a problem with the construction queues not wrapping from turn to turn. I would happly build 4 LV3s in five turns If it were possible (Well I would calculate which made more sense first ) As it is now, it is a lot like desiging a ship to be finished in an exact number of turns.
__________________
I thought of the sun as a big bright ball of something that produced an intense absence of darkness. Alan Dean Foster No More Crystal Tears
A++SeGdy$+-++Fr?C++++Cst+SfAi--Mm-MpTS---SsROPw++Fq++Nd++++RpG++Mm++Bb
|
March 10th, 2004, 01:56 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 575
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Removing that silly restriction of having to waste production capacity if it is not used completely for the current item would really be a big improvement. It would eliminate ALL needs for silly workarounds, and most of the micromanagement still needed for this game. Imagine not having to create ships that use exactly a multiply of your production capacity, not having to calculate if switching emergency build on/off might be useful, etc.
I really hope this silly feature will be gotten rid of in SE V.
|
March 10th, 2004, 02:33 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Anything that helps you beat me is a cheesy tactic.
Anything that helps me beat you is a perfectly fair tactic.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
March 10th, 2004, 02:45 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Advance Storage Techniques gives 30 slots?
Whoa, I'm getting that one next time.
Does that means that the Homeworld starts with a few empty slots or will those extra slots be filled?
__________________
Traits:
Siegebreaker: +1 command when under siege
Good-looking: +1 influence
Social drinker: +1 influence
Obsessional trainer: +1 morale to troops, forced march
Devout: -1 influence
Administratively inept: -2 management
Retinue:
|
March 10th, 2004, 05:16 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Agreed. Allowing the construction queue to spill over would make things more "realistic" and solve a lot of the "peeves" out there, but we probably won't see any more patches.
Anyway, it looks like the community has spoken on this subject.
Slick.
__________________
Slick.
|
March 10th, 2004, 07:29 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Agreed
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|
March 10th, 2004, 04:02 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
As long as we can "branch out a bit", and though it's a small thing, it would be nice if, when a planet on repeat build fills all the facility slots that it would turn off the "repeat" switch. I get irritated at going to a place and telling it to build a spy sat, or a group of fighters (or something similar) and noticing later that it is repeating that build.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
March 10th, 2004, 04:35 PM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
As long as we can "branch out a bit", and though it's a small thing, it would be nice if, when a planet on repeat build fills all the facility slots that it would turn off the "repeat" switch. I get irritated at going to a place and telling it to build a spy sat, or a group of fighters (or something similar) and noticing later that it is repeating that build.
|
I'd like 2 more things that generate log entries along this idea:
1) let me know when a planet is on emergency build but not building anything
2) let me know when a construction queue finishes so that I can do my "per planet" upgrade thing that I mentioned in the first post in this thread.
Slick.
__________________
Slick.
|
March 11th, 2004, 02:12 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: upgrading facilities pet peeve
On a similar note one of my pet peeves is when you upgrade a ship design and then the new design is illegal. Such as what happens when the new upgraded component takes up more space than the original (ie shields).
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|