Will Oceanians ever lose "poor amphib." on land?

[Uh-Nu-Buh]

Reverend Zombie said:
Attack, defense, encumbrance penalites. I don't recall the exact numbers. You could check this yourself, you know.

I did, couldn't see what the $$$$ you were blathering about, but was trying to be polite and assume I was just being stupid or dense.

I guess I will just take the high road here though, and not mention anything about you BEING WRONG and BEING A RUDE $$$$.

Heh heh... just messing with you, dude. I should have checked it myself, just as you said. ;-)

[Reverend Zombie]

Uh-Nu-Buh said:

I did, couldn't see what the $$$$ you were blathering about, but was trying to be polite and assume I was just being stupid or dense.

It would have been more helpful if you just said, "I checked the numbers, here they are, and you are wrong," instead of pussyfooting around.

[UninspiredName]

...Nice choice of sig, by the way.

[BigJMoney]

Sounds to me like the icon change is a fluke, but it's a harmless fluke since neither of the amphibious traits have an effect on units while they're on land. I think you have a good eye for catching it, personally. Two years from now a newbie will come into the forums asking this exact question, and nobody will know what the hell he's talking about, and he'll get probably similar responses. I call this effect the "Circle of Dominion".

=$= Big J Money =$=

[Beorne]

SelfishGene said:
Shouldn't Agartha be a poor amphibian nation instead of normal amphib?

I'm of the same idea, only the "wet ones" described as living uw should be amphibian. I'd like to know if it is a bug or if it is working as intended.