|
|
|
|
 |
|
September 20th, 2008, 01:56 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 674
Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
A serious dominion boost or something for a few turns would be a thematic reward for winning the arena.
|
September 20th, 2008, 03:29 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Quote:
Originally Posted by sum1lost
A serious dominion boost or something for a few turns would be a thematic reward for winning the arena.
|
Or maybe you could get an item like a standard that would boost morale.
Jazzepi |
September 20th, 2008, 05:16 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Or maybe you could get a special arena heroic ability.
|
September 20th, 2008, 06:06 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 739
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Quote:
Originally Posted by sum1lost
A serious dominion boost or something for a few turns would be a thematic reward for winning the arena.
|
I like this one. The boost should be greater if it's your pretender that wins. |
September 21st, 2008, 12:59 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 138
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzepi
I've always felt that the arena is a huge miss for Illwinter. It's got a ton of potential, but none of it was utilized.
|
Agreed. |
September 21st, 2008, 02:10 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Probably because JK and I never have agreed on it. I'm of the opinion that you should not send pretenders, but regular guys so they turn into heroes, while JK (who dislikes to play with diversified armies and troops and likes SC's) think it is fine and good with pretender arena battles.
We both like it and laugh whenever you people say that the trident is a lousy reward |
September 21st, 2008, 02:36 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristoffer O
Probably because JK and I never have agreed on it. I'm of the opinion that you should not send pretenders, but regular guys so they turn into heroes, while JK (who dislikes to play with diversified armies and troops and likes SC's) think it is fine and good with pretender arena battles.
We both like it and laugh whenever you people say that the trident is a lousy reward
|
No offense, but are you serious? Do you know how bad that trident is? I'd rather have a faithful in the hands of 90% of my SC Gods than that thing. You might as well have written "+extra encumbrance" on it.
Jazzepi |
September 21st, 2008, 03:23 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzepi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristoffer O
Probably because JK and I never have agreed on it. I'm of the opinion that you should not send pretenders, but regular guys so they turn into heroes, while JK (who dislikes to play with diversified armies and troops and likes SC's) think it is fine and good with pretender arena battles.
We both like it and laugh whenever you people say that the trident is a lousy reward
|
No offense, but are you serious? Do you know how bad that trident is? I'd rather have a faithful in the hands of 90% of my SC Gods than that thing. You might as well have written "+extra encumbrance" on it.
Jazzepi |
To be fair, the trident is quite nice for a low end thug who doesn't engage enemies alone.
Of course, that is not the person who is going to win the death match. Go figure. :P |
September 21st, 2008, 03:40 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
The arena itself aside, I'll add this to the bug shortlist.
If I had to take a guess, this problem was caused by the province changing ownership and the pretender not being able to return because of that. A simple fix would be that the participants always return to the province where they started from, no matter who holds it. If it's in enemy hands, a battle would then ensue.
|
September 21st, 2008, 03:50 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: The unexpected fall of Kailasa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzepi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristoffer O
Probably because JK and I never have agreed on it. I'm of the opinion that you should not send pretenders, but regular guys so they turn into heroes, while JK (who dislikes to play with diversified armies and troops and likes SC's) think it is fine and good with pretender arena battles.
We both like it and laugh whenever you people say that the trident is a lousy reward
|
No offense, but are you serious? Do you know how bad that trident is? I'd rather have a faithful in the hands of 90% of my SC Gods than that thing. You might as well have written "+extra encumbrance" on it.
Jazzepi |
Of course But if you are not a SC god you wouldn't mind having it. Also it was made in the times when quickness was applicable to spells as well. But still it is not for Gods. Since I prefer not to see pretenders in the arena it suits me well that it is not too good. |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
