|
|
|
|
 |
|
May 30th, 2006, 11:23 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 822
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
I know you don't mean Ermor, because Ermor staled...
Quote:
RonD said:
Quote:
Ygorl said:
OK, who dispelled my Gift?
|
Uh, whom do we suppose might have the astral resources to do such a thing?
|
|
May 30th, 2006, 01:46 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
yeah, she was never designed to take out my fellow wyrms.
|
May 30th, 2006, 07:35 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
All Wyrms should note that Arcoscephale has signed on to passed Proposition 39 following B'hemet's return from Holy Day celebration.
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|
May 30th, 2006, 07:47 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
was it still open at the time? I mean do votes count after it ha s closed and passed?
|
May 30th, 2006, 08:16 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
|
May 30th, 2006, 11:48 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 232
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
Since Pasha is in favor, I'm inclined to let Arco slide on the time limit (due to the holiday) this time, unless somebody objects.
|
May 31st, 2006, 12:09 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
But ... doesn't that make fewer armies I can eat???
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|
May 31st, 2006, 12:35 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
yes, it does. I am tempted to put something out there to make the prospect of war less confusing
|
May 31st, 2006, 09:22 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
It means that all Wyrms that voted in favor can attack Arco, but that those same Wyrms (including Arco's Wyrm) can counter-attack. For example, Ulm and Abysia might attack Arco. But, then Arco and T.C. can counter-attack, etc., but then Mictlan, Man and Pythium can attack T.C. for attacking Abysia and Ulm, etc.
Sounds like Vyrmin will have many, many things to eat!
|
May 31st, 2006, 01:30 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition 39
so basically it very nearly degenerates the council - or rather makes the diplomatic peace insanely fragile, in regards to arco.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
